The Prospector News

Gwen Preston – “Mailbox: Premium Nickel”

You have opened a direct link to the current edition PDF

Open PDF Close
Uncategorized

Share this news article

Gwen Preston – “Mailbox: Premium Nickel”

 

 

 

 

 

I had a question about your recent Premium Nickel comments. The topic is the prospect of only a 62% recovery of nickel in the ore. Assuming the downhole EM’s do in fact turn out decent tonnage, is the 62% recovery a deal killer? Also: any thoughts on how to assess the probability that they can meaningfully improve that number?

Reader CL

 

62% recovery is not ideal, to be sure. Is it a deal breaker? No. If the EM plates indeed represent massive sulphide deposits of good grade, then the scale of what’s at hand could handle 62% recovery.

 

But improvements would be lovely, of course.

 

The standard flowsheet they tested generated two tailings streams – one high volume/low sulphur and one low volume/high sulphur – and two concentrates (copper and nickel-cobalt). Copper recoveries are great. Nickel is only 62%. To improve that they’re testing different grind sizes. They are also seeing if there’s a way to second-process the low volume/high sulphur tailings, as that’s where the unrecovered nickel ends up. For example, would some kind of hydrometallurgical process liberate more nickel from the tailings?

 

It’s good it’s the low-volume tailings that would potentially need another round of work. Lower volume is less capital and operating expense.

 

Odds of success? I think it’s likely they will find a way to pull a good chunk (perhaps half?) of the remnant nickel from the tailings. The question will then be the cost and complexity of adding that step to the process plant. Since it’s hydromet (basic chemistry) of low volumes and not high-pressure chemistry of high volumes, costs are not likely going to be dramatic.

 

This is 20,000-foot arm waving at this point, based on general principles. Until PNRL says more about the met processes they’re testing, I can’t really say more!

 

But I do think (1) the targets here are big enough, and the precedents suggest they could be rich enough, to very much make 62% recovery work, even if higher recoveries would be better and (2) there is a good chance PNRL will find an economic way to improve from 62%.

 

Courtesy of Resource Maven

 

Posted July 18, 2023

Share this news article

MORE or "UNCATEGORIZED"


Q2 Metals Discovers High Grade Zone with 170.2 Metre Intercept of 1.99% Li₂O, Including 40.1 m of 2.89% Li₂O at the Cisco Lithium Project

Highlights: CS25-063: 13 separate intervals, including: 75.4 m at... READ MORE

February 24, 2026

Aya Gold & Silver Identifies New Parallel Structure at Boumadine and Reports High-Grade Exploration Results

Additional Boumadine Mining Licence Secured   Aya Gold & Sil... READ MORE

February 24, 2026

OR Royalties Announces Acquisition of Additional Royalties on Spring Valley in Nevada

OR Royalties Inc. (TSX:OR) (NYSE:OR) is pleased to announce that ... READ MORE

February 24, 2026

Gold X2 Mining Defines Additional High Grade Corridors with Intersects of 87.0m of 1.75 g/t Au and 83.0m @ 1.56 g/t Au at QES Zone Grade Control Drilling

Gold X2 Mining Inc. (TSX-V: AUXX) (OTCQB: GSHRF) (FWB: DF8), is ... READ MORE

February 24, 2026

Goliath Reports Numerous High-Grade Intercepts Including 24.16 g/t AuEq Over 7.00 Meters, Grade Values Increased By 19.6 % In 56 Gold Equivalent Drill Results, And Expands Vast Stacked Vein System At Surebet Discovery, Golden Triangle, B.C.

Accounting for Silver, Copper, Lead and Zinc within these 56 dril... READ MORE

February 24, 2026

Copyright 2026 The Prospector News