The Prospector News

Gwen Preston – “Mailbox: Premium Nickel”

You have opened a direct link to the current edition PDF

Open PDF Close
Uncategorized

Share this news article

Gwen Preston – “Mailbox: Premium Nickel”

 

 

 

 

 

I had a question about your recent Premium Nickel comments. The topic is the prospect of only a 62% recovery of nickel in the ore. Assuming the downhole EM’s do in fact turn out decent tonnage, is the 62% recovery a deal killer? Also: any thoughts on how to assess the probability that they can meaningfully improve that number?

Reader CL

 

62% recovery is not ideal, to be sure. Is it a deal breaker? No. If the EM plates indeed represent massive sulphide deposits of good grade, then the scale of what’s at hand could handle 62% recovery.

 

But improvements would be lovely, of course.

 

The standard flowsheet they tested generated two tailings streams – one high volume/low sulphur and one low volume/high sulphur – and two concentrates (copper and nickel-cobalt). Copper recoveries are great. Nickel is only 62%. To improve that they’re testing different grind sizes. They are also seeing if there’s a way to second-process the low volume/high sulphur tailings, as that’s where the unrecovered nickel ends up. For example, would some kind of hydrometallurgical process liberate more nickel from the tailings?

 

It’s good it’s the low-volume tailings that would potentially need another round of work. Lower volume is less capital and operating expense.

 

Odds of success? I think it’s likely they will find a way to pull a good chunk (perhaps half?) of the remnant nickel from the tailings. The question will then be the cost and complexity of adding that step to the process plant. Since it’s hydromet (basic chemistry) of low volumes and not high-pressure chemistry of high volumes, costs are not likely going to be dramatic.

 

This is 20,000-foot arm waving at this point, based on general principles. Until PNRL says more about the met processes they’re testing, I can’t really say more!

 

But I do think (1) the targets here are big enough, and the precedents suggest they could be rich enough, to very much make 62% recovery work, even if higher recoveries would be better and (2) there is a good chance PNRL will find an economic way to improve from 62%.

 

Courtesy of Resource Maven

 

Posted July 18, 2023

Share this news article

MORE or "UNCATEGORIZED"


South Pacific Metals Extends the Mineralized Structures at Megabe to More than 300 Metres of Confirmed Strike Length; Structures Open Along Strike and at Depth

Step-out drilling places SPMC on the upper margin of a potential ... READ MORE

August 24, 2026

North Arrow Extends Target AE Strike Length to 1000 m and Completes Rotation 3 Regional RC Drilling, Kraaipan Gold Project, Botswana

New surface targets identified North Arrow Minerals Inc. (... READ MORE

August 24, 2026

USA Rare Earth Announces Completion of Upsized $1.55 Billion Capitalization of the U.S. Government-Backed Special Purpose Vehicle for Serra Verde Offtake

U.S. Department of War (DoW) provides a $750 million investment i... READ MORE

August 24, 2026

Lavras Gold Intersects High-Grade Gold at Caneleira, Supporting Near-Surface Continuity of the Vein System

Hole 26CN044 returns 24.30 g/t gold over a drilled width of 9 met... READ MORE

August 24, 2026

Ivanhoe Electric Receives Preliminary Project Letter from the Export-Import Bank of the United States for $1.1 Billion in Potential Debt Financing for the Santa Cruz Copper Project

Letter Provides Increased Potential Debt Financing from $825 Mill... READ MORE

August 24, 2026

Copyright 2026 The Prospector News