The Prospector News

Gwen Preston – “Mailbox: Premium Nickel”

You have opened a direct link to the current edition PDF

Open PDF Close
Uncategorized

Share this news article

Gwen Preston – “Mailbox: Premium Nickel”

 

 

 

 

 

I had a question about your recent Premium Nickel comments. The topic is the prospect of only a 62% recovery of nickel in the ore. Assuming the downhole EM’s do in fact turn out decent tonnage, is the 62% recovery a deal killer? Also: any thoughts on how to assess the probability that they can meaningfully improve that number?

Reader CL

 

62% recovery is not ideal, to be sure. Is it a deal breaker? No. If the EM plates indeed represent massive sulphide deposits of good grade, then the scale of what’s at hand could handle 62% recovery.

 

But improvements would be lovely, of course.

 

The standard flowsheet they tested generated two tailings streams – one high volume/low sulphur and one low volume/high sulphur – and two concentrates (copper and nickel-cobalt). Copper recoveries are great. Nickel is only 62%. To improve that they’re testing different grind sizes. They are also seeing if there’s a way to second-process the low volume/high sulphur tailings, as that’s where the unrecovered nickel ends up. For example, would some kind of hydrometallurgical process liberate more nickel from the tailings?

 

It’s good it’s the low-volume tailings that would potentially need another round of work. Lower volume is less capital and operating expense.

 

Odds of success? I think it’s likely they will find a way to pull a good chunk (perhaps half?) of the remnant nickel from the tailings. The question will then be the cost and complexity of adding that step to the process plant. Since it’s hydromet (basic chemistry) of low volumes and not high-pressure chemistry of high volumes, costs are not likely going to be dramatic.

 

This is 20,000-foot arm waving at this point, based on general principles. Until PNRL says more about the met processes they’re testing, I can’t really say more!

 

But I do think (1) the targets here are big enough, and the precedents suggest they could be rich enough, to very much make 62% recovery work, even if higher recoveries would be better and (2) there is a good chance PNRL will find an economic way to improve from 62%.

 

Courtesy of Resource Maven

 

Posted July 18, 2023

Share this news article

MORE or "UNCATEGORIZED"


Kingsmen Resources Raises $4,151,250 in Non-Brokered Private Placement

KINGSMEN RESOURCES LTD. (TSX-V: KNG), (OTC: KNGRF) (FSE: TUY) is... READ MORE

November 24, 2025

Atico Reports Multiple High-Grade Intercepts up to 8.70m of 11.44% Cu, 14.65 g/t Au and 6.16m of 13.32% Cu, 2.79 g/t Au and Continues to Extend the Ore Body at El Roble Mine in Colombia

Atico Mining Corporation (TSX-V: ATY) (OTCQX: ATCMF) is pleased t... READ MORE

November 24, 2025

Defense Metals Receives Support from the McLeod Lake Indian Band while Meeting in Ottawa with Canadian Government Officials to Advance the Wicheeda Rare Earth Project

Defense Metals Corp. (TSX-V: DEFN) (OTCQB: DFMTF) (FSE: 35D), a c... READ MORE

November 24, 2025

Copper Giant Announces Updated Mocoa Inferred Mineral Resource of 1.1 Billion Tonnes at 0.51% CuEq* (0.31% Cu and 0.039% Mo)

Mocoa’s High-Grade Core: Sensitivity table shows 190 milli... READ MORE

November 24, 2025

McFarlane Files Mineral Resource Estimate on Juby Gold Project

Key Highlights  3.17 million inferred ounces of gold at 0.89 g/t... READ MORE

November 24, 2025

Copyright 2025 The Prospector News