U.S. GoldMining Inc. (NASDAQ: USGO) is pleased to announce an updated Mineral Resource Estimate for the Company’s 100% owned Whistler Gold-Copper Project in Alaska, U.S.A. The updated MRE is set forth in a technical report summary titled ” S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary Initial Assessment for the Whistler Project, South Central Alaska ” with an effective date of September 12, 2024, which was filed today under subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K (“SK-1300”) and available under the Company’s profile at www.sec.gov (the “S-K 1300 Report”). The estimate incorporates 2023 drilling results, revised geological interpretation within the Whistler Deposit, and refreshed cut-off grade assumptions for the overall Project.
Highlights:
Tim Smith, Chief Executive Officer of U.S. GoldMining, commented: “In less than one-and-a-half years since completing our initial public offering, U.S. GoldMining’s exploration initiatives have resulted in strengthened confidence in the mineral resource estimate for its flagship Whistler Deposit by increasing estimated gold equivalent ounces in the indicated category by 117% from prior estimates. The Project now contains 6.5 Moz AuEq in the indicated resource category and an additional 4.2 Moz AuEq in the inferred resource category. The successful 2023 drilling program at Whistler improved our confidence in the proximity of mineralization close to surface, extended mineralization along strike to the south, confirmed the consistency of mineralization within the high-grade core of the deposit and grew the overall resource primarily by the drill bit.
Since the mineral resource estimate was updated, additional results of the 2024 program have been received including the extension of the WH23-03 mineralized intercept to 652.5m at 1.00 g/t AuEq, further confirming the continuity of mineralization within the high-grade core. Our recently completed 2024 drilling program within the Whistler deposit further confirmed the geological model while drill testing below the current mineral resource block model for additional potential extensions of the mineral system. We look forward to receiving additional results from the 2024 drill hole assays which we believe will continue to support the Project’s potential to host a long-life, high-quality gold-copper-silver mine located in one of the most favorable mining jurisdictions in the United States.”
Updated Mineral Resource Estimate Overview
The MRE was based on 43,096 meters of drill data available as of January 16, 2024, (refer to the Company’s news release dated January 16, 2024, for further details), prior to the commencement of the Company’s ongoing 2024 drill campaign. The author of the report conducted a site visit August 6, 2024, which included collection of independent duplicate samples for umpire laboratory analysis. The Effective Date for the updated MRE is September 12, 2024. The MRE is constrained within a revenue factor 1.5 pit shell and reported above a US$10/tonne cut-off value (equivalent to 0.27 g/t AuEq cut-off grade).
The October 2024 updated Whistler MRE incorporates:
The following table sets forth a summary of the Whistler 2024 MRE update.
Table 1: Mineral Resource Estimate for the Total Whistler Project (Effective date: September 12, 2024)
Class | Deposit | Cut-off Value |
ROM Tonnage |
In situ Grades | In situ Metal | |||||||
(US$/t) | (ktonnes) | NSR (US$/t) |
AuEqv (g/t) |
Au (g/t) |
Cu (%) |
Ag (g/t) |
AuEqv (koz) |
Au (koz) |
Cu (mlbs) |
Ag (koz) |
||
Indicated | Whistler Pit | 10 | 282,205 | 22.84 | 0.68 | 0.41 | 0.16 | 1.89 | 6,201 | 3,724 | 999 | 17,166 |
Raintree Pit | 10 | 8,905 | 21.08 | 0.63 | 0.46 | 0.08 | 4.81 | 180 | 131 | 16 | 1,378 | |
Indicated Open Pit | varies | 291,410 | 22.79 | 0.68 | 0.41 | 0.16 | 1.98 | 6,381 | 3,855 | 1,015 | 18,544 | |
Raintree UG | 25 | 3,064 | 34.41 | 1.03 | 0.79 | 0.13 | 4.49 | 101 | 78 | 9 | 443 | |
Total Indicated | varies | 294,474 | 22.91 | 0.68 | 0.42 | 0.16 | 2.01 | 6,482 | 3,933 | 1,024 | 18,987 | |
Inferred | Whistler Pit | 10 | 18,224 | 21.01 | 0.63 | 0.40 | 0.13 | 1.75 | 368 | 233 | 54 | 1,025 |
Island Mountain Pit | 10 | 124,529 | 18.21 | 0.54 | 0.45 | 0.05 | 1.02 | 2,180 | 1,817 | 139 | 4,084 | |
Raintree Pit | 10 | 15,056 | 23.12 | 0.69 | 0.55 | 0.06 | 4.36 | 335 | 267 | 21 | 2,112 | |
Inferred Open Pit | varies | 157,809 | 19.00 | 0.57 | 0.45 | 0.06 | 1.42 | 2,883 | 2,317 | 214 | 7,221 | |
Raintree UG | 25 | 40,432 | 32.81 | 0.98 | 0.76 | 0.12 | 3.31 | 1,275 | 994 | 103 | 4,300 | |
Total Inferred | varies | 198,241 | 21.82 | 0.65 | 0.52 | 0.07 | 1.81 | 4,158 | 3,311 | 317 | 11,521 |
Notes to Table 1:
1. | Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no certainty that all or any part of the mineral resources will be converted into mineral reserves. |
2. | Inferred mineral resources are subject to uncertainty as to their existence and as to their economic and legal feasibility. The level of geological uncertainty associated with an inferred mineral resource is too high to apply relevant technical and economic factors likely to influence the prospects of economic extraction in a manner useful for evaluation of economic viability. |
3. | The Mineral Resource Estimate for the Whistler, Island Mountain, and the upper portions of the Raintree West deposits have been confined by an open pit with “reasonable prospects of economic extraction” using the following assumptions: |
• Metal prices of US$1,850/oz Au, US$4.00/lb Cu and US$23/oz Ag; | |
• Payable metal of 95% payable for Au and Ag, and 96.5% payable for Cu | |
• Refining costs for Au of US$8.00/oz, for Ag of US$0.60/oz and for Cu of US$0.05/lb. | |
• Offsite costs for Au of US$77.50/wmt, for Ag of US$3.50/wmt and for Cu of US$55.00/wmt. | |
• Royalty of 3% NSR; | |
• Pit slopes are 50 degrees; | |
• Mining cost of US$2.25/t for waste and mineralized material; and | |
• Processing, general and administrative costs of US$7.90/t. | |
4. | The lower portion of the Raintree West deposit has been constrained by a mineable shape with “reasonable prospects of eventual economic extraction” using a US$25.00/t cut-off. |
5. | Metallurgical recoveries are: 70% for Au, 83% for Cu, and 65% Ag for Ag grades below 10g/t. The Ag recovery is 0% for values above 10g/t for all deposits. |
6. | The NSR equations are: below 10g/t Ag: NSR (US$/t)=(100%-3%)*((Au*70%*US$54.646/t) + (Cu*83%*US$3.702*2204.62 + Ag*65%*US$0.664)), and above 10g/t Ag: NSR (US$/t)=(100%-3%)*((Au*70%*US$56.646g/t) + (Cu*83%*US$3.702*2204.62)) |
7. | The Au Equivalent equations are: below 10g/t Ag: AuEq=Au + Cu*1.771 +0.0113Ag, and above 10g/t Ag: AuEq=Au + Cu*1.771 |
8. | The specific gravity for each deposit and domain ranges from 2.76 to 2.91 for Island Mountain, 2.60 to 2.72 for Whistler with an average value of 2.80 for Raintree West. |
9. | The SEC definitions for Mineral Resources in S-K 1300 were used for Mineral Resource classification which are consistent with Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM) Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves (CIM (2014) definitions). |
10. | Numbers may not add due to rounding. |
Additional details of the mineral resource estimate are set forth in the S-K 1300 Report titled “S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary Initial Assessment for the Whistler Project”, Effective Date 12 September 2024 and Date of Issue 7 October 20204, a copy of which is available under the Company’s profile at www.sec.gov. The Company plans to file a Canadian National Instrument 43-101 technical report within 45 days of the date hereof.
*For comparison, the previous 2022 MRE (Effective Date September 22, 2022) comprised 118 Mt at 0.79 g/t AuEq for 2.99 Moz AuEq Indicated resources, and 317 Mt at 0.63 g/t Au for 6.45 Moz AuEq Inferred resources, at a US$10.50/t cutoff value for open pit resources and US$25/t for underground resources.
Whistler Project High-Grade Core
The updated 2024 Whistler MRE is underpinned by a significant component of higher-grade mineralization within the core of the three deposits. Table 2 illustrates the MRE at a range of cut-offs which provide optionality for potential future mine development scenarios. For example, using an elevated cut-off value of US$20/t (equivalent to 0.37 g/t AuEq cut-off grade) for open pit resources, the MRE contains a robust higher grade subset resource of:
Table 2: Whistler Project 2024 resources sensitivity to cut-off values. The Whistler Project MRE which is stated at $10/t cutoff value for open pit resources (equivalent to 0.27 g/t AuEq cutoff grade), and $25/t cutoff value for underground resources, is highlighted.
|
|||||||||||||
Class | |||||||||||||
Source | Cutoff | ROM Tonnage |
In situ Grades | In situ metal | |||||||||
(US$/t) | (ktonnes) | NSR (US$/t) |
AuEqv (g/t) |
Au (g/t) |
Cu (%) |
Ag (g/t) |
AuEqv (Koz) |
Au (koz) |
Cu (klbs) |
Ag (koz) |
|||
Indicated | Open Pit | 6 | 333,200 | 20.98 | 0.63 | 0.37 | 0.15 | 1.99 | 6,717 | 3,999 | 1,088,419 | 20,822 | |
7 | 327,336 | 21.24 | 0.63 | 0.38 | 0.15 | 1.99 | 6,680 | 3,983 | 1,080,877 | 20,541 | |||
7.9 | 319,301 | 21.59 | 0.65 | 0.39 | 0.15 | 1.99 | 6,623 | 3,958 | 1,068,264 | 20,024 | |||
10 | 291,410 | 22.79 | 0.68 | 0.41 | 0.16 | 1.99 | 6,381 | 3,855 | 1,015,095 | 18,544 | |||
15 | 206,236 | 27.03 | 0.81 | 0.51 | 0.18 | 1.99 | 5,356 | 3,382 | 798,024 | 13,449 | |||
20 | 131,449 | 32.55 | 0.97 | 0.65 | 0.19 | 2.08 | 4,111 | 2,728 | 561,495 | 8,809 | |||
25 | 85,710 | 38.03 | 1.14 | 0.79 | 0.21 | 2.18 | 3,132 | 2,166 | 393,659 | 5,985 | |||
30 | 57,629 | 43.30 | 1.29 | 0.92 | 0.22 | 2.27 | 2,397 | 1,706 | 281,879 | 4,184 | |||
Underground | 25 | 3,064 | 34.41 | 1.03 | 0.79 | 0.13 | 4.49 | 101 | 78 | 8,613 | 443 | ||
Total Indicated |
varies | 294,474 | 22.91 | 0.68 | 0.42 | 0.16 | 2.02 | 6,482 | 3,933 | 1,023,708 | 18,987 | ||
Inferred | Open Pit | 6 | 247,250 | 14.99 | 0.45 | 0.36 | 0.05 | 1.24 | 3,563 | 2,827 | 276,142 | 9,874 | |
7 | 222,529 | 15.94 | 0.48 | 0.38 | 0.05 | 1.28 | 3,408 | 2,718 | 260,061 | 9,168 | |||
7.9 | 202,534 | 16.78 | 0.50 | 0.40 | 0.06 | 1.31 | 3,267 | 2,614 | 245,757 | 8,536 | |||
10 | 157,809 | 19.00 | 0.57 | 0.45 | 0.06 | 1.43 | 2,883 | 2,317 | 213,970 | 7,221 | |||
15 | 83,445 | 24.97 | 0.75 | 0.60 | 0.08 | 1.74 | 2,003 | 1,611 | 149,376 | 4,638 | |||
20 | 46,184 | 31.30 | 0.94 | 0.76 | 0.10 | 1.98 | 1,389 | 1,129 | 99,917 | 2,923 | |||
25 | 28,112 | 37.12 | 1.11 | 0.91 | 0.11 | 2.19 | 1,003 | 827 | 68,000 | 1,983 | |||
30 | 16,408 | 44.16 | 1.32 | 1.11 | 0.12 | 2.35 | 696 | 590 | 41,316 | 1,242 | |||
Underground | 25 | 40,432 | 32.81 | 0.98 | 0.76 | 0.12 | 3.31 | 1,275 | 994 | 102,953 | 4,300 | ||
Total Inferred |
varies | 198,241 | 21.82 | 0.65 | 0.52 | 0.07 | 1.81 | 4,158 | 3,311 | 316,923 | 11,521 |
In particular, the flagship Whistler Deposit contains a high-grade core defined by coincident approximately ≥0.40 g/t gold and ≥0.20% Cu grade contours that extend approximately 500 m in the north-south dimension, 250 m in the east-west dimension and extend to 600 m depth (from surface), where it remains open down dip. The Whistler Deposit high-grade core offers the option to consider low strip ratio, higher – grade starter-pit scenarios. Table 3 provides an incremental breakdown of the Whistler Deposit MRE as contained within sequentially expanding pit shells which are illustrated in Figure 3.
Table 3: Whistler Deposit 2024 MRE incremental breakdown within conceptual phased pit shells. |
||||||||||
PIT PHASE | CLASS | Mineralized Tonnage |
NSR | AuEQ | Au | Cu | Ag | In Situ Metal |
Waste Tonnage |
Strip Ratio |
(ktonnes) | (US$/tonne) | (g/t) | (g/t) | ( %) | (g/t) | (AuEq koz) | (ktonnes) | Waste:Minz | ||
PHASE 1 | Indicated | 22,425 | 34.81 | 1.04 | 0.65 | 0.23 | 2.30 | 750 | 1,776 | 0.08 |
Inferred | – | – | – | – | – | – | — | |||
PHASE 2 | Indicated | 42,703 | 29.4 | 0.88 | 0.56 | 0.19 | 2.00 | 1,206 | 17,684 | 0.41 |
Inferred | 910 | 16.28 | 0.49 | 0.26 | 0.13 | 2.00 | 14 | |||
PHASE 3 | Indicated | 106,892 | 23.71 | 0.71 | 0.43 | 0.16 | 1.80 | 2,435 | 117,922 | 1.04 |
Inferred | 6,722 | 22.39 | 0.67 | 0.44 | 0.14 | 1.70 | 145 | |||
PHASE 4 | Indicated | 69,425 | 17.61 | 0.53 | 0.29 | 0.14 | 1.80 | 1,175 | 145,808 | 1.96 |
Inferred | 4,944 | 19.81 | 0.59 | 0.36 | 0.14 | 1.60 | 94 | |||
PHASE 5 | Indicated | 41,061 | 16.08 | 0.48 | 0.257 | 0.13 | 1.8 | 634 | 238,127 | 5.10 |
Inferred | 5,648 | 21.18 | 0.633 | 0.409 | 0.13 | 1.9 | 115 | |||
Total Indicated | 282,506 | 22.84 | 0.68 | 0.41 | 0.16 | 1.87 | 6,201 | 521,317 | 1.73 | |
Total Inferred | 18,224 | 21.01 | 0.63 | 0.40 | 0.13 | 1.75 | 368 |
Whistler Project Geology
The Whistler Deposit is hosted within the Whistler Intrusive Suite (see Figure 2), a composite suite of diorite stocks and dykes with cross-cutting relationships that divide the suite broadly into an early Main Stage Porphyry, a later cross-cutting Intermineral Porphyry Suite and the latest cross-cutting intrusive phase referred to as the Late Stage Porphyry. Gold and copper mineralization is characterized by presence of disseminated sulphide and quartz + sulphide vein stockworks (including classic porphyry diagnostic ‘A’, ‘B’, ‘D’, and ‘M’ type veins), and potassic alteration which is variably overprinted by later phyllic alteration. The early-stage MSP suite is most strongly altered, veined and mineralized, with the IMP being less intensely altered and veined but remaining consistently mineralized, and the late or post-mineralization LSP generally being below cutoff grade or unmineralized. The ‘high-grade core’ correlates with intense potassic alteration and highest frequency of A and B veining within the MSP.
Based on re-logging of historical drill core in conjunction with the 2023 drilling program, the Whistler Deposit three-dimensional geological model was re-interpreted to include adjustments to geometry, extents and continuity of the MSP, IMP and LSP suites. These were used as a guide to create mineralization shells for both Au-Ag and Cu separately. The shells include a higher grade ‘core’, with lower grade shells also generated to constrain both Au-Ag and Cu mineralization. A significant change in the 2024 geological model is the removal of the ‘Divide Fault’, which defined a hard boundary between geological and geostatistical domains in previous iterations of the Whistler deposit model. Relogging and 2023 drilling has confirmed there is no compelling evidence for this fault, thus the previously modelled Divide Fault is no longer seen to influence the mineralization.
Subsequently, gold and copper grade shells have been constructed to constrain the Whistler Deposit mineral block model, honoring the geological boundaries defined by the limits of the productive MSP and ISP, and taking into account the weakly to non-mineralized LSP.
Mineralization at Raintree West occurs as two main types: 1) porphyry-style gold-copper mineralization hosted by diorite porphyry stocks and consisting of quartz and magnetite stockwork veining, with vein and disseminated chalcopyrite associated with potassic alteration, and 2) later cross-cutting silver-gold-lead-zinc mineralization in quartz-carbonate veins with occasional banded epithermal-like textures. The early gold-copper mineralization is best developed within, and controlled by, early diorite porphyry intrusions (akin to MSP at the Whistler Deposit), whereas the later silver-gold-lead-zinc veins surround and locally overprint the porphyry mineralization and are most abundant in the host andesitic composition volcanic.
The Island Mountain deposit, located 20 km south of the Whistler-Raintree deposits, is comprised of a suite of nested intrusions, ranging compositionally from hornblende diorite to hornblende-biotite monzonite, with mineralization occurring predominantly within the ‘Breccia Zone’, comprising intrusive breccias occurring as sub-vertical 100-150 m diameter ‘pipes’ with pyrrhotite-pyrite-chalcopyrite mineralization, that host the bulk of gold-copper porphyry mineralization.
Technical Information
The disclosure herein, including relating to mineral resource estimates, has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Canadian securities laws, as set forth in NI 43-101, which references the guidelines set out in the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum classification system, the CIM Definition Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves, adopted by the CIM Council, and in accordance with the requirements found in S-K 1300.
The technical work of the 2024 Whistler Project MRE was completed by Sue Bird, P.Eng., of Moose Mountain Technical Services, an independent qualified person as defined by NI 43-101 and S-K-1300. Sue Bird has reviewed, verified and approved the technical information related to the MRE in this news release.
Tim Smith, P.Geo., Chief Executive Officer of U.S. GoldMining, has supervised reviewed and approved the preparation of all other scientific and technical information contained herein. Mr. Smith is a qualified person as defined by NI 43-101 and S-K 1300.
About U.S. GoldMining Inc.
U.S. GoldMining Inc. is an exploration and development company focused on advancing the 100% owned Whistler Gold-Copper Project, located 105 miles (170 kilometers) northwest of Anchorage, Alaska, U.S.A. The Whistler Project consists of several gold-copper porphyry deposits and exploration targets within a large regional land package totaling approximately 53,700 acres (217.5 square kilometers).
Figure 1 – Plan map of the Whistler Project showing the location of the Whistler, Raintree and Island Mountain gold-copper-silver deposits which cumulatively make up the Whistler MRE. (CNW Group/U.S. GoldMining Inc.)
Figure 2 – Plan view map of the Whistler Deposit showing the geological interpretation of the Whistler Intrusive Suite and highlighting the location of 2023 drilling used in the October 2024 MRE update. (CNW Group/U.S. GoldMining Inc.)
Figure 3 – Cross section through Whistler Deposit showing the September 2024 updated MRE block model and conceptual phased pit shells corresponding with Table 3. (CNW Group/U.S. GoldMining Inc.)
Falco Resources Ltd. (TSX-V: FPC) is pleased to announce the closing of ... READ MORE
Arizona Metals Corp. (TSX: AMC) (OTCQX: AZMCF) is pleased to announce th... READ MORE
Skyharbour Resources Ltd. (TSX-V: SYH) (OTCQX: SYHBF) (Frankfurt... READ MORE
Brunswick Exploration Inc. (TSX-V: BRW) (OTCQB: BRWXF) (FRANKFURT:1XQ) i... READ MORE
Blue Moon Metals Inc. (TSX-V: MOON), Nussir ASA and Nye Sulitjel... READ MORE