The Prospector News

Treasury Metals Announces Positive Preliminary Economic Assessment for Goliath Gold Complex

You have opened a direct link to the current edition PDF

Open PDF Close
Uncategorized

Share this news article

 

 

 

 

 

$477 Million pre-tax NPV5%; pre-tax IRR OF 37.3% (post-tax $328 Million and 30.2%) at US$1,600 per ounce gold

 

 

Highlights (all currencies are reported in Canadian dollars unless otherwise specified):

  • LOW CAPITAL INTENSITY PROJECT WITH PRE-PRODUCTION CAPITAL COST OF $233 MILLION AND PRE-TAX PAYBACK PERIOD OF LESS THAN 2 YEARS
  • ROBUST ECONOMICS WITH POST-TAX $328 MILLION NPV5%; IRR OF 30.2%; AT US$1,600 PER OUNCE GOLD
  • MINE LIFE OF 13 YEARS, WITH AVERAGE ANNUAL GOLD PRODUCTION DURING FIRST 9 YEARS OF 102,000 OUNCES AND TOTAL LOM RECOVERED GOLD OF ~1.1 MILLION OUNCES
  • WORLD-CLASS INFRASTRUCTURE INCLUDES EXISTING HYDRO POWER, NATURAL GAS AND CP RAIL LINES PLUS TRANS-CANADA HIGHWAY
  • BOARD APPROVAL TO ADVANCE THE PROJECT TO THE PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY STAGE
  • LEVERAGE TO GOLD PRICE: $726 MILLION NPV5% PRE-TAX AT RECENT SPOT PRICE OF US$1,850 PER OUNCE GOLD

 

Treasury Metals Inc. (TSX: TML) (OTCQB: TSRMF) (Frankfurt: TRC1) is pleased to announce the results from a preliminary economic assessment for the Company’s Goliath Gold Complex which includes the Goliath, Goldlund and Miller deposits along a prospective 65-kilometre trend in northwestern Ontario. The PEA, prepared by Ausenco Engineering Canada Inc. in accordance with National Instrument 43-101, demonstrates the potential to develop a low-cost 5,000 tonnes per day combined open pit and underground mining operation with strong economics and the opportunity for significant benefit to the Company, Indigenous Nations and local stakeholders.

 

“With the announcement of the PEA results today, combined with receipt of the federal Environmental Assessment approval in 2019, we have confirmed the Goliath Gold Complex has sufficient critical mass and we expect Treasury Metals to become one of Ontario’s next gold producers. Our robust base case for the project supports a 13-year mine life with average annual production of 102,000 ounces of gold for the first nine years with a post-tax NPV of $328 million and IRR of 30.2%,” said Jeremy Wyeth, President and CEO of Treasury Metals. “The project is underpinned by a high-quality resource, and we have taken a conservative approach to resource estimation, with the total M&I ounces virtually unchanged from previous estimates. We also see significant exploration potential across our 330-square-kilometre land package. In 2021, we are focusing on in-fill and definition drilling to better define the resource, while also initiating step-out drilling to test new targets around both the Goliath and Goldlund deposits.”

 

Treasury continues to advance Goliath Gold Complex through the commencement of trade-off optimization studies as part of the pre-feasibility level study work, baseline environmental work, community engagement and other critical activities to the required level to facilitate the provincial permitting process.

 

Goliath Gold Complex PEA Overview

 

The Goliath Gold Complex PEA was prepared by Ausenco in collaboration with other technical consultants and the Company’s operations and exploration teams (see Qualified Persons section below).

 

The PEA was prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 and the technical report that summarizes the results of the Goliath Gold Complex PEA will be filed on the Company’s website and on SEDAR within 45 days of this news release.

 

PEA Assumptions and Economic Results

 

General
Gold price assumption per ounce US$1,600
Exchange Rate ($US:$CAD) 0.75
Economics (pre-tax)
Net present value (NPV 5%) $ millions $477
Internal rate of return (IRR) % 37.3%
Payback (undiscounted) Years 1.92
Average annual cash flow* $ millions $74
Cumulative cash flow (undiscounted)* $ millions $991
Economics (post-tax)
Net present value (NPV 5%) $ millions $328
Internal rate of return (IRR) % 30.2%
Payback (undiscounted) Years 2.17
Average annual cash flow* $ millions $58
Cumulative cash flow (undiscounted)* $ millions $775
Mining
Mine life years 13.5
Total LOM recovered gold ,000 ounces 1,064
Average annual mining rate  million tpa 1.8
Average annual gold production, years 1-9 ounces/year 102,000
Peak gold production in year 5 ounces 119,000
Gold Recovery (LOM) % 93.64%
Initial capital costs $ millions $233
AISC** US$ per ounce Au $911

 

*Cash flows during operational period
**AISC includes cash costs plus sustaining capital, closure cost and salvage value

 

The PEA is preliminary in nature, includes inferred mineral resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves, and there is no certainty that the PEA will be realized. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

 

Mining and Processing

 

The PEA considers a combined open pit and underground mining operation utilizing the resources from three different pit areas over the life of the mine. It is envisioned that mining will be initiated at the Goliath project due to both its proximity to the processing facility and its existing federal EA approval. With significant environmental and baseline work underway it has been assumed that mining at the Goldlund deposit will follow the initial start of production by approximately one year. The Goliath underground operations are expected to begin development in year three with first underground production to come in year four of the proposed mining operations. Proposed open pit and underground mining is envisioned as being conventional truck and loader/shovel and long hole stoping, respectively.

 

The process plant will treat 1.8Mt of ore per year at an average throughput of 4,875 tonnes per day with an availability of 92%. The plant design includes a three-stage crushing circuit, ball mill, gravity concentration, classification, standard leach and Carbon-In-Leach (CIL) technology, and detoxification before deposition into a Tailings Storage Facility (TSF).

 

The process plant has been designed to realize an average recovery of 95.7% of the gold sourced from Goliath, 91.9% sourced from Goldlund, and 89.6% sourced from Miller over the life of the project. Of this, the gravity circuit recovers 17%-44% of the gold across the three different ore sources. Gold recovery has been based on metallurgical test work completed on Goliath and Goldlund material between 2011 and 2017 with the confidence in recoveries reflecting the more extensive metallurgical work done at Goliath compared to Goldlund and Miller.  Metallurgical testing planned for 2021 at Goldlund and Miller is expected to improve recovery assumptions.

 

The Company will provide additional details related to Tailings Management and Closure in the PEA report filed on SEDAR within 45 days.

 

 

Mining & Processing Inputs
Mine life – Total years 13.5
Mining Rate
Open Pit (Year 1-5 average) tpd 45,000
Underground (Peak production) tpd 1,400
Open Pit
Total Mill feed million tonnes 21.0
Open Pit – gold grade g/t 1.17
Open Pit – silver grade g/t 0.80
Total waste million tonnes 82.5
Total Material Mined million tonnes 103.5
Open pit strip ratio waste:mill feed 3.93
Underground
Total mill feed (underground) million tonnes 3.0
Underground – stope gold grade g/t 3.67
Underground – silver grade g/t 9.05
Processing
Feed Rate tpd 4,875
Total tonnes processed Million tonnes 24.0
Mill head grade – gold g/t 1.47
Mill head grade – silver g/t 1.82
LOM gold recovery % 93.6%
LOM silver recovery % 60.0%

 

A mine plan summary is included in Appendix 1 at the end of this news release.

 

Operating Costs

 

Mining costs for owner operated mining were developed from first principles with local vendor quotations and detailed haulage profiles. Process plant operating costs were developed based on the labour requirements and calculated consumption rates of reagents, consumable materials, and electrical power associated with the plant equipment. Costing factors were applied leveraging in-house data based on comparable gold milling operations in Ontario. Processing costs include plant maintenance and upkeep.

 

 

Operating Costs (life of mine average)
Mining costs (open pit) $/t mined 3.27
Mining costs (open pit) $/t processed 16.95
Mining costs (underground) $/t processed 70.31
Processing costs $/t processed 11.37
G&A costs $/t processed 2.28
Total site operating costs $/t processed 40.70
Cash Costs
Cash costs (LOM)* $/oz Au 699
All-in sustaining costs (LOM)** $/oz Au 911
*Cash costs consist of mining costs, processing costs, mine-level general & administrative expenses and refining charges and royalties
**AISC includes cash costs plus sustaining capital, closure cost and salvage value

 

Initial and Sustaining Capital Costs

 

Initial capital costs in the PEA are estimated to be $233 million including a contingency of 5% on mining equipment, and 25% on all other direct costs, excluding pre-production stripping.  Life of mine sustaining capital is estimated at $313 million, primarily for Goliath underground development and TSF construction. A small sustaining capital budget is allocated to the processing plant, with general plant maintenance and upkeep accounted for in operating costs.

 

 

Initial Capital Costs ($ millions)
Mining equipment and infrastructure $20
Pre-production mining $25
Processing plant $65
Site infrastructure $51
Project delivery, owner’s costs and other indirects $43
Contingency $30
Total Initial Capital $233
Sustaining Capital Costs ($ millions)
Mining equipment $26
Underground mine development $136
Mining infrastructure $55
TSF $71
Process plant sustaining capital $1
Site closure and reclamation $24
Total Sustaining Capital $313

 

Site closure and reclamation include final closure costs for the Goliath, Goldlund and Miller projects. Costs address demolition of facilities, placement of covers on the tailing facility and waste rock storage areas, and revegetation of disturbed areas.

 

Economic Sensitivity to Gold Price

 

Sensitivities of post-tax NPV and post-tax IRR to gold price per ounce are as follows:

 

Gold Price

US$/oz

Post-Tax NPV(5%)

Base Case

Initial CAPEX Total OPEX FX
(-25%) (+25%) (-25%) (+25%) (-25%) (+25%)
$1,200 $47 $101 ($8) $170 ($93) $331 ($163)
$1,400 $189 $244 $134 $308 $66 $513 ($15)
$1,600 $328 $383 $273 $445 $208 $694 $102
$1,850 $498 $553 $443 $615 $381 $921 $243
$2,000 $600 $655 $545 $717 $484 $1,057 $326

 

 

 

Gold Price

US$/oz

Post-Tax IRR

Base Case

Initial CAPEX Total OPEX FX
(-25%) (+25%) (-25%) (+25%) (-25%) (+25%)
$1,200 9.3% 16.9% 4.4% 19.0% 0.0% 30.4% 0.0%
$1,400 20.7% 31.0% 14.3% 28.5% 11.3% 41.5% 3.5%
$1,600 30.2% 42.7% 22.4% 37.1% 22.5% 51.4% 14.1%
$1,850 40.7% 55.6% 31.3% 46.8% 34.0% 62.7% 24.6%
$2,000 46.4% 62.6% 36.2% 52.2% 40.2% 69.2% 30.1%

 

All-In-Sustaining-Cost*


All-in-sustaining costs* are built up as follows:

 

 

AISC US$ per ounce of Au*
Operating Cost $688
Royalties $16
Refining Cost $11
Silver Credit ($16)
Subtotal Cash Cost $699
Sustaining Capital $204
Salvage Value ($8)
Closure $17
Total AISC $911

 

Mineral Resource Estimate

 

The mineral resource estimate for Goliath used as the basis for the PEA with an effective date of December 16, 2020 was completed using a total of 726 surface drill holes with an aggregated length of 238,036 metres and a total of 96,912 assays. The QP responsible for the resource estimate is Pierre Desautels P.Geo of AGP Mining Consultants.

 

For Goldlund, the mineral resource estimate with an effective date of October 23, 2020 was completed using a total of 176,498 metres of drill core and channel samples entered as pseudo holes distributed in 856 surface drill holes, 189 surface trench channel samples, 480 underground drill holes, and 246 underground channel samples for a total of 114,102 gold assays. The QP responsible for the estimate is Chris Keech P. Geo. of CGK Consulting Services Inc.

 

For Miller, the mineral resource estimate with an effective date of October 26, 2020 was completed using a total of 96 surface drill holes totalling 7,386 metres. Of those, 26 intersected the mineralized domains and were used in the resource estimate. The QP responsible for the estimate is Paul Daigle P. Geo of AGP Mining Consultants.

 

The table summarizes the resource estimate for all three deposits. The material amenable to open pit extraction was reported within Lerchs-Grossman optimized resource constraining shell, while the material amenable to underground extraction was reported within a 3-dimensional wireframe representing a likelihood of being coherent mining shapes with reasonable prospect of being accessed. Open pit resource constraining shell and underground resource shapes were provided by AGP’s Engineering team.

 

For the Goliath Deposit, a gold price of US$1,700 /ounce and a silver price of US$23 /ounce was used for the cut-off determination. For open pit resources, a cut-off of 0.25 g/t gold was used. Resources below the open pit shell used a cut-off of 1.60 g/t gold to define possible underground resources.  For the Goldlund and Miller Deposits, a gold price of US$1,700 /ounce was used for the cut-off determination. For open pit resources, a cut-off of 0.26 g/t gold was used. Resources below the open pit shell at Goldlund used a cut-off of 1.60 g/t gold to define possible underground resources.

 

 

Deposit Cut-off
Grade (g/t)
Quantity
(‘000 tonnes)
Grade Gold
(g/t)
Contained Gold
(‘000 oz)
Measured Resources
Goliath Open Pit 0.25 1,471 1.90 90
Goliath Underground 1.6 98 4.84 16
Total Measured 1,569 2.09 105
Indicated Resources
Goliath Open Pit 0.25 26,956 0.87 757
Goliath Underground 1.6 2,592 3.16 263
Goldlund Open Pit 0.26 24,300 1.07 840
Total Indicated 53,848 1.07 1,860
Total Measured and Indicated 55,417 1.10 1,965
Inferred Resources
Goliath Open Pit 0.25 5,644 0.65 76
Goliath Underground 1.6 704 2.75 62
Goldlund Open Pit 0.26 14,400 0.56 260
Goldlund Underground 1.6 233 6.8 51
Miller Open Pit 0.26 1,981 1.24 79
Total Inferred 22,962 0.77 528
Note on Mineral Resources:
(1) Mineral resources are estimated in conformance with the CIM Mineral Resource definitions referred to in NI 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. This mineral resource estimate covers the Goliath Deposit, the Goldlund Deposit and the Miller deposit.
(2) Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. The quantity and grade of the reported Inferred Mineral Resources in this estimation are conceptual in nature and are estimated based on limited geological evidence and sampling. Geological evidence is sufficient to imply but not verify geological and grade or quality continuity. For these reasons, an Inferred Mineral Resources has a lower level of confidence than an Indicated Mineral Resources and it is reasonably expected that the majority of Inferred Mineral Resources could be upgraded to Indicated Mineral Resources with continued exploration.
(3) Goliath: Mineral resources are reported within an optimized constraining shell using a gold price of US$1700/Oz and a Silver price of US$23/Oz and recoveries of 95.5% for gold and 62.6% for silver and a base mining, processing + G&A costs of $CDN18.68/tonne open pit, $CDN93.54/tonne for underground.
Grades were estimated using 1.5-meter capped composites via Ordinary kriging for the Main and C zones and inverse distance cubed for all other zones.
(4) Goldlund: Mineral resources are reported within an optimized constraining shell using a gold price of US$1700/Oz and gold recovery of 89% and a mining and processing + G&A costs of $CDN18.51/tonne open pit, $CDN93.53/tonne for underground and $CDN2.71/tonne for base mill feed cost.
Gold grades were estimated using 2.0 m capped composites within 9 mineralized zones using ordinary kriging.
(5) Miller: Mineral resources are reported within an optimized constraining shell using a gold price of US$1700/Oz and gold recovery of 89% and a mining, base mill feed and G&A cost of US$21.22/tonnes.
Grades were estimated using 2.0 m capped composites within the granodiorite domain using Inverse Distance Cubed interpolation.
(6) Summation errors may occur due to rounding.

 

Overall, a more conservative approach was taken to the mineral resource estimation methodologies on all sites in anticipation of a potential future mining and construction decision. For both Goliath and Goldlund a probabilistic estimation approach was used to model the gold and silver mineralization.

 

For Goliath, this differs from the previous mineral resource estimate approach that used discrete wireframes created from both geological contacts and drill assay results for the underground model and wider wireframes for the open pit model. With the new methodology, the entire mineralized corridor for the Main Zone and C-Zone were wireframed conventionally and then, internally sub-divided in a low grade, medium grade and high grade components using a probabilistic approach.  The resulting single model respects the known geological information while ensuring that the grade distribution is more representative of the field condition. This has resulted in having a more conservative approach to continuity of the mineralization in both the low grade (Open Pit) and high grade (Underground) zones.

 

For Goldlund, the mineral resource estimation approach has considered a more conservative treatment of unsampled historic intervals to limit the influence of high-grade samples within the mineralized zones. The Goldlund probability mineral resource estimation approach has also revised the search strategy and geological domains to ensure that the modelling better reflects the controls on gold mineralization.  This has resulted in a more conservative mineral resource estimate with more tonnes at a lower average grade above cut-off.  Drilling is currently underway that specifically targets areas that have insufficient drill hole density with the goal of increasing the confidence in the continuity and adding inferred mineral resources in those areas.

 

The results of these updated resource estimates allow for a much larger proportion of Measured and Indicated resources to be included in the proposed mining plan.  The following graph shows the high proportion of Measured and Indicated resources within the proposed mine plan. Additional exploration drilling is currently ongoing that is anticipated to enhance resource continuity based on this approach to previously assumed levels.

 

Further details on the mineral resource estimate will be available in the technical report on www.sedar.com and on the Company’s website at www.treasurymetals.com.

 

Permitting and Approvals

 

The approach to environmental permitting and approvals for the Goliath Gold Complex will be to treat the Goliath, Goldlund and Miller deposits as three distinct projects for provincial permitting, all being processed at the mill facility within the existing federal EA approval for Goliath.

 

The schedule for permitting and approvals for the Goliath Gold Project is more advanced than the schedule for Goldlund and Miller, given that a Federal Environmental Assessment (EA) has already been completed for this Project. Specifically, on August 19, 2019, Treasury Metals received Federal Government approval under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012 for the Goliath Gold Project, with the Minister of Environment and Climate Change Canada concluding that with implementation of appropriate mitigation measures, the Project is not likely to cause significant adverse environmental effects. Therefore, following the release of the PEA, the Goliath Gold Project may proceed directly into provincial permitting and other environmental approvals using the updated proposed mining plan, while additional baseline data collection will be completed for Goldlund and Miller to support anticipated future provincial approval processes. A full year of baseline data collection has been completed for the Goldlund site and will continue throughout the remainder of 2021 to support the anticipated future provincial approval processes.

 

Opportunities

 

The PEA has outlined a number of initiatives that may enhance the project which include:

 

  • For Goldlund, 6,400 metres of additional infill drilling in Zone 1 to confirm the continuity of high-grade mineralization and convert indicated to measured mineralization; 29,000 metres of additional infill drilling in Zones 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 9 to convert inferred mineralization to indicated mineralization; and 7,200 metres of exploration drilling to confirm the northeast extensions of Zones 1 and 4.
  • For Goliath, the focus will be on converting the remaining Inferred resources to the Indicated category in preparation for a Pre-Feasibility Study. The proposed resource conversion program consists of approximately 31,000 metres of additional drilling across the full strike of proposed underground mine plan. A small, limited drill program is also proposed for resource expansion between covering a strike length of 200 metres on the eastern portion of the deposit which could result in sufficient material amenable to open pit extraction. This small program consists of approximately 3,000 metres of additional drilling.
  • Further metallurgical test work to increase gold recovery at Goldlund and Miller.
  • The use of mined out open pit areas provide an opportunity for the storage of tailings and waste material.  There is a significant volume that could be utilized for storage on a long term basis that would both reduce cost, and importantly provide an opportunity to limit the footprint and volume of tailings stored above surface.
  • The transport of Goldlund mineralized materials represents a significant cost that could be reduced by the use of ore sorting technology.  Goldlund material has been shown to be amenable to such technology and prioritized for study.
  • The optimization of transporting material from the Goldlund and Miller sites to the Goliath Mill facility represents an opportunity for reduced cost. Additional studies will be completed in the next phase to better define the capital and operating costs of various options including different trucking options and the use of technologies such as Railveyor that provide efficient transport options.
  • Additional testing of the correlation of gold to silver at the Goldlund and Miller deposits has the opportunity to add silver to the resource if completed.  The limited test data at the Goldlund resource is not sufficient to be included as part of the resource, but it should be noted that in this limited testing there does appear to be silver associated with some samples.  A more fulsome assay program should be instituted to re-assay available samples and include assaying for future drill programs to investigate whether or not sufficient correlation is possible to create a silver by product from mining.

 

Next Steps

 

The Company intends to immediately initiate trade-off and optimization studies as part of a formal Pre-Feasibility Study, baseline environmental work, and other critical studies with a view to completing all required engineering work to facilitate the provincial permitting process later this year. Engagement with local communities and Indigenous Nations will also continue throughout the year.

 

In addition, the Company will continue exploration drilling at the Goldlund deposit totalling approximately 42,000 metres, which will include both infill and definition drilling, as well as additional drilling at the Miller deposit. The Company intends to mobilize a second drill at the Goliath deposit in the spring to conduct infill and definition drilling totalling approximately 27,000 metres in order to explore targets at depth and along strike which are outside the existing resource. Contingent on the success of the drill program and market conditions, the Company may consider mobilizing a third exploration drill.

 

Qualified Persons

 

The PEA for the Treasury Metal Goliath Gold Complex summarized in this news release was completed by Ausenco together with other technical consultants and will be incorporated in a NI 43-101 technical report which will be available under Treasury’s SEDAR profile at www.sedar.com, and on the Treasury website at www.treasurymetals.com within 45 days of this news release.  The affiliation and areas of responsibility for each of the Qualified Persons involved in preparing the PEA, upon which the technical report will be based, are as follows: Mr. Tommaso Roberto Raponi, P.Eng – Qualified Person for Processing and Metallurgy; Mr. Pierre Desautels, P.Geo. – Qualified Person for Goliath Mineral Resource Evaluation; Mr. Christopher Keech, P.Geo – Qualified Person for Goldlund Mineral Resource Evaluation;  Mr. Paul Daigle, P.Geo – Qualified Person for Miller Resource Evaluation; Mr. Gordon Zurowski, P.Eng – Qualified Person for Mine Engineering and Costing;  Reagan McIsaac, Ph.D., P.Eng. – Qualified Person for Tailings Management; Sheila Daniel, P.Geo. – Qualified Person for Closure and Closure Costing,

 

By virtue of their education, membership to a recognized professional association and relevant work experience, Mr. Tommaso Roberto Raponi, Mr. Pierre Desautels, Mr. Christopher Keech,

Mr. Paul Daigle, and Mr. Gordon Zurowski, are independent Qualified Persons as defined under NI 43-101.

 

Data Verification

 

The Qualified Persons responsible for the preparation of the PEA and the technical report in respect thereof have verified the data disclosed in this news release, including sampling, analytical, and test data underlying the information contained in this news release. Geological, mine engineering and metallurgical reviews included, among other things, reviewing mapping, core logs, and re-logging existing drill holes, review of geotechnical and hydrological studies, environmental and community factors, the development of the life of mine plan, capital and operating costs, transportation, taxation and royalties, and review of existing metallurgical test work. In the opinion of the Qualified Persons, the data, assumptions, and parameters used to estimate Mineral Resources, the metallurgical model, the economic analysis, and the PEA are sufficiently reliable for those purposes. The technical report in respect of the PEA, when filed, will contain more detailed information concerning individual responsibilities, associated quality assurance and quality control, and other data verification matters, and the key assumptions, parameters and methods used by the Company.

 

Mark Wheeler, P.Eng., Director, Projects, and Adam Larsen, Exploration Manager, are both considered as a “Qualified Person” for the purposes of National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Project (“NI 43-101“), and have reviewed and approved the scientific and technical disclosure contained in this news release on behalf of Treasury.

 

About Treasury Metals Inc.

 

Treasury Metals Inc. is a gold focused company with assets in Canada. Treasury’s Goliath Gold Complex, which includes the Goliath, Goldlund and Miller deposits along a 65-kilometre trend, is located in Northwestern Ontario. The deposits benefit substantially from excellent access to the Trans-Canada Highway, related power and rail infrastructure, and close proximity to several communities including Dryden and Sioux Lookout, Ontario. The Company also owns several other projects throughout Canada, including the Lara Polymetallic Project, Weebigee-Sandy Lake Gold Project JV, and grassroots gold exploration property Gold Rock.

 

About Ausenco

Ausenco is a global company based across 26 offices in 14 countries, with projects in over 80 locations worldwide. Combining deep technical expertise with a 30-year track record, Ausenco delivers innovative, value-add consulting studies, project delivery, asset operations and maintenance solutions to the mining & metals, oil & gas and industrial sectors

 

Appendix 1

 

Mine Plan Summary

 

 

Total Total Year
-1
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Year
4
Year
5
Year
6
Year
7
Year
8
Year
9
Year
10
Year
11
Year
12
Year
13
Year
14
Mill Feed Mill Feed
(Kt)
23,966 1,530 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 836
Au (g/t) 1.47 2.37 1.93 1.76 1.98 2.16 2.09 1.78 1.61 1.60 1.13 0.52 0.45 0.41 0.41
Ag (g/t) 1.82 1.5 1.6 1.3 4.0 3.0 2.7 2.7 2.1 2.5 0.1 0.6 1.7 1.7
Goliath Mill Feed
 Open Pit  Mill Feed
(Kt)
6,099 301 353 26 602 197 1,314 670 1,800 836
Au (g/t) 0.97 3.22 2.98 2.74 2.21 1.33 0.66 0.41 0.41 0.41
Ag (g/t) 2.77 7.80 7.98 10.50 4.36 2.97 2.05 1.68 1.68 1.68
 Underground  Mill Feed
(Kt)
2,965 181 450 511 511 511 501 283 18
Au (g/t) 3.67 3.31 3.62 4.22 4.04 3.32 3.27 3.56 4.92
Ag (g/t) 9.05 11.14 10.27 9.32 9.34 9.45 7.60 6.61 8.37
 Goldlund Mill Feed  Mill Feed
(Kt)
13,590 1,229 1,447 1,800 1,593 749 925 1,171 1,111 1,085 36 1,782 662
Au (g/t) 1.25 2.16 1.68 1.76 1.82 1.24 1.22 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.77 0.48 0.48
Ag (g/t)
 Miller Mill Feed  Mill Feed
(Kt)
1,312 167 118 178 214 168 468
Au (g/t) 1.16 1.32 1.91 1.92 1.85 0.76 0.46
Ag (g/t)

 

 


Mill Feed by Resource Category (CNW Group/Treasury Metals Inc.)

 

Posted February 2, 2021

Share this news article

MORE or "UNCATEGORIZED"


Kirkland Lake Gold Reports Solid Production in First Quarter 2021

Kirkland Lake Gold Ltd. (TSX:KL) (NYSE:KL) (ASX:KLA) announced pr... READ MORE

April 9, 2021

Ascot Resources Ltd. Announces Closing of C$61,000,000 Bought Deal Financing

Ascot Resources Ltd. (TSX: AOT) (OTCQX: AOTVF) is pleased to ann... READ MORE

April 9, 2021

Rio Tinto reaches agreement with Turquoise Hill Resources on financing plan for Oyu Tolgoi

Rio Tinto has entered into a binding Heads of Agreement with Turq... READ MORE

April 9, 2021

Frontier Lithium Announces Acquisition of the 2.5% Net Smelter Royalty on the PAK Lithium Project

Frontier Lithium Inc. (TSX-V: FL) (OTCQX: LITOF) (FSE: HL2) annou... READ MORE

April 9, 2021

Uranium Energy Corp Completes Financing and Reports Over $110 Million in Cash, Equity and Inventory Holdings as of April 9, 2021

Uranium Energy Corp (NYSE: UEC) is pleased to announce the closin... READ MORE

April 9, 2021

Copyright 2021 The Prospector News