The Prospector News

Bunker Hill Announces Prefeasibility Study for First Phase of Mine Restart

You have opened a direct link to the current edition PDF

Open PDF Close

Share this news article

Bunker Hill Announces Prefeasibility Study for First Phase of Mine Restart







  • Average annual FCF of >$25 million, EBITDA of >$40 million, and zinc-equivalent production of >90 million pounds
  • Attractive financial returns, including $52 million NPV8 ($63 million NPV5), 36% IRR, and 2.1 year pay-back
  • Initial capex of $55 million achieves expanded 1,800 tpd operation, leveraging mineral endowment of the largest-scale and shallowest major mine in Idaho’s Silver Valley, and one of the most prolific mines in US history
  • Rapid restart of 16 months to commercial production for ‘Stage 1’ five-year mine plan on M&I Resources only
  • All-in Sustaining Cost position of $0.77 per payable pound of zinc, net of by-products
  • ‘Phase 1’ mine plan zinc equivalent production of 475 million pounds at a zinc equivalent grade of 8.5%, including 317 million pounds of zinc, 146 million pounds of lead, and 3 million ounces of silver
  • ‘Phase 2’ opportunities include resource conversion to unlock value from Inferred Resources which remain open for expansion, further increased scale, ongoing metallurgical optimization, and ore sorting
  • Silver Valley-based, experienced operating team, on-site construction-ready mill, no permitting constraints



Bunker Hill Mining Corp. (CSE: BNKR) is pleased to report the results of a Prefeasibility Study for the first phase of the restart of the Bunker Hill Mine in Idaho’s Silver Valley, USA.


The PFS plan describes a $55 million (including contingency) initial capital cost to rapidly restart the mine by the end of 2023, generating over $25 million of annual average free cash flow from an initial 5-year mine plan based on Probable Mineral Reserves to produce over 315 million pounds of zinc, 145 million pounds of lead, and 3 million ounces of silver at an estimated All-in Sustaining Cost of $0.77 per payable pound of zinc (net of by-products).


Sam Ash, CEO of Bunker Hill, stated: “We are very pleased to announce our Prefeasibility Study for ‘Phase 1’ of our multi-phase value-generation plan for the Bunker Hill Mine outlining how we intend to commence profitable, sustainable, modern operations by the end of 2023. As demonstrated in our PFS, Bunker Hill is a sustainable low-risk, high-margin asset with the potential to generate free cash flow of over $25 million per year while contributing to strategic metal production in the United States beginning in 2024 and providing a significant economic boost to our many community partners in the Silver Valley of Northern Idaho. We are now focused on driving forward to a formal construction decision while maintaining momentum with ongoing restart activities.”


The PFS was prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101. MineTech USA, LLC (MineTech) developed the mine infrastructure, capex and opex related portions of the PFS as well as portions of the mine plan and operating schedules in coordination with Bunker Hill’s team who directed Patterson & Cooke North America for the tailing backfill components, YaKum Consulting Inc for metallurgy and processing and Barr Engineering for process design and milling. The Company plans to file the completed PFS report on SEDAR at within 45 days of this press release. All “t” and “ton” references in this press release are to short tons and “$” references are in U.S. dollars.


Highlights of the PFS are presented in Table 1 below:


Table 1: Phase 1 Prefeasibility Study Results Summary          
    16 months             Years 1-5
Year   Initial
1   2   3   4   5   TOTAL ANNUAL
Metal Prices                  
Zinc ($/lb)   1.50   1.40   1.30   1.25   1.25   1.25   1.29   1.29  
Lead ($/lb)   0.95   0.95   0.95   0.95   0.95   0.95   0.95   0.95  
Silver ($/oz)   22.00   22.00   22.00   21.50   21.50   21.50   21.70   21.70  
Mine plan                  
Ore mined (kt)   77   652   655   655   655   665   3,360   657  
Zinc grade (%)   5.9 % 5.6 % 4.7 % 5.7 % 5.7 % 5.9 % 5.5 % 5.5 %
Lead grade (%)   2.1 % 2.4 % 2.7 % 2.9 % 2.4 % 1.9 % 2.5 % 2.5 %
Silver grade (oz/t)   0.5   0.7   1.3   1.4   1.2   0.8   1.1   1.1  
Zinc eq grade (%)   7.7 % 8.0 % 8.1 % 9.4 % 8.8 % 8.2 % 8.5 % 8.5 %
Zinc concentrate (t)   6,671   53,504   44,852   54,997   55,061   57,909   272,995   53,265  
Lead concentrate (t)   2,091   20,945   23,577   25,078   20,955   16,605   109,251   21,432  
Zn grade – Zn conc (%)   58.0 % 58.0 % 58.0 % 58.0 % 58.0 % 58.0 % 58.0 % 58.0 %
Pb grade – Pb conc (%)   67.0 % 67.0 % 67.0 % 67.0 % 67.0 % 67.0 % 67.0 % 67.0 %
Ag grade – Pb conc (oz/t)   14.4   18.6   31.5   30.1   31.0   27.4   27.6   27.7  
Zn prod. – Zn conc (klbs)   7,738   62,065   52,029   63,796   63,871   67,174   316,674   61,787  
Pb prod. – Pb conc (klbs)   2,802   28,067   31,593   33,605   28,080   22,251   146,397   28,719  
Ag prod. – Pb conc (koz)   30   390   742   754   649   455   3,020   598  
Zinc eq produced (klbs)   9,954   87,233   87,679   102,310   96,375   91,909   475,460   93,101  
Cost metrics                  
Mining ($/t)     35   38   37   35   41   37   37  
Processing ($/t)     21   21   21   21   21   21   21  
G&A ($/t)     9   9   9   9   6   9   9  
Opex – total ($/t)     65   68   67   65   69   67   67  
Sustaining capex ($/t)     18   22   19   41   8   21   21  
Cash costs: by-prod. ($/lb Zn payable) 0.61   0.42   0.36   0.45   0.64   0.50   0.50  
AISC: by-prod. ($/lb Zn payable)   0.82   0.74   0.59   0.95   0.73   0.77   0.77  
Free Cash Flow & Valuation ($000’s)                  
Zinc revenue     73,857   57,492   67,784   67,863   71,373   338,368   67,674  
Lead revenue     25,330   28,513   30,328   25,342   20,081   129,595   25,919  
Silver revenue     7,900   15,515   15,406   13,256   9,260   61,337   12,267  
Gross revenue     107,087   101,520   113,518   106,461   100,714   529,300   105,860  
TC – Zinc conc     (16,257 ) (11,138 ) (13,657 ) (13,673 ) (14,380 ) (69,105 ) (13,821 )
TC – Lead conc     (3,698 ) (4,162 ) (4,428 ) (3,700 ) (2,932 ) (18,919 ) (3,784 )
RC – Lead conc     (449 ) (882 ) (896 ) (771 ) (538 ) (3,535 ) (707 )
Land freight     (2,193 ) (2,019 ) (2,360 ) (2,239 ) (2,192 ) (11,002 ) (2,200 )
Net smelter return     84,491   83,319   92,178   86,079   80,672   426,739   85,348  
Mining costs     (22,828 ) (24,592 ) (23,971 ) (22,927 ) (27,454 ) (121,772 ) (24,354 )
Processing costs     (13,766 ) (13,842 ) (13,842 ) (13,842 ) (14,053 ) (69,346 ) (13,869 )
G&A costs     (6,050 ) (6,063 ) (6,063 ) (6,063 ) (4,257 ) (28,496 ) (5,699 )
EBITDA     41,847   38,822   48,302   43,247   34,908   207,126   41,425  
Sustaining capex     (11,475 ) (14,127 ) (12,651 ) (26,982 ) (5,215 ) (70,450 ) (14,090 )
Initial capex   (54,853 )           (54,853 )  
Land & salvage value             12,281   12,281   12,281  
Pre-tax free cash flow   (54,853 ) 30,372   24,695   35,650   16,266   41,974   94,103   29,791  
Taxes   (511 ) (1,394 ) (1,382 ) (2,218 ) (1,155 ) (1,224 ) (7,884 ) (1,475 )
Free cash flow   (55,364 ) 28,978   23,313   33,432   15,111   40,750   86,219   28,317  
NPV (5%)   62,826                
NPV (8%)   51,813                
IRR (%)   36.0 %              
Payback (years)   2.1                


Mineral Resource Estimate


Mineral Resources for the Bunker Hill Mine are Inclusive of Mineral Reserves. Metallurgical recoveries and concentrate grade specifications reflect the current data supported by the PFS. Mineral Resources are reported at an NSR cutoff of $70/ton. Mineral Resources are reported in situ and undiluted. Mineral Resources meet the reasonable prospects of eventual economic extraction due to the fact that the entire vertical extents of the mineralization have been developed on mining levels every two-hundred-feet. High grade capping was applied to the assays prior to grade estimation. Grades are estimated using Inverse Distance Cubed (ID3) interpolation techniques. A bulk density of 11.3 cubic feet per ton was applied to the entire Mineral Resource based upon historic density values from production records at Bunker Hill. Historic mining voids, stopes and development drifting have been accounted for in the Mineral Resource Estimate.


Table 2: Bunker Hill Mine Mineral Resource Estimate – NSR $70/ton cutoff – Ag selling price of $20/oz (troy), Lead selling price of $1.00/lb, Zn selling price of $1.20/lb. Effective date of August 29, 2022.


Classification Ton (x1,000) NSR
Ag Oz
Pb % Pb Lbs.
Zn % Zn Lbs.
Measured (M) 2,374 $ 119.60 1.01 2,404 2.46 116,574 5.37 254,811
Indicated (I) 4,662 $ 119.81 1.00 4,657 2.37 221,295 5.48 510,964
Total M & I 7,036 $ 119.74 1.00 7,061 2.40 337,869 5.44 765,774
Inferred 6,943 $ 126.28 1.52 10,532 2.87 398,901 4.96 688,482

(1) The Qualified Person for the above estimate is Scott Wilson, C.P.G., SME; effective August 29, 2022
(2) Measured, Indicated and Inferred classifications are based on the 2014 CIM Definition Standards.
(3) Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability
(4) Net smelter return (NSR) is defined as the return from sales of concentrates, expressed in US$/t, i.e.: NSR = (Contained metal) * (Metallurgical recoveries) * (Metal Payability %) * (Metal prices) – (Treatment, refining, transport and other selling costs). For the Mineral Resource Estimate, NSR values were calculated using updated open-cycle metallurgical results including recoveries of 85.1%, 84.2% and 88.2% for Zn, Ag and Pb respectively, and concentrate grades of 58% Zn in zinc concentrate, and 67% Pb and 12.13 oz/ton Ag in lead concentrate.
(5) Mineral Resources are estimated using a zinc price of $1.20 per pound, silver price of $20.00 per ounce, and lead price of $1.00 per pound.
(6) Historic mining voids, stopes and development drifting have been depleted from the Mineral Resource Estimate
(7) Totals may not add up due to rounding


Mineral Reserve Estimate


Mineral Reserves are reported from the Quill, Newgard and UTZ sections of the Project. Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources were converted to Probable Mineral Reserves for the mine. Due to the distribution of mineralization, a portion of Inferred Mineral Resources has been included in the estimation of internal dilution at zero grade. Ongoing metallurgical work, minimal bulk mining / sampling of material in the Mineral Resource Estimate and current development advancement, were considered for the estimation of Probable Mineral Reserves. Continued technical evaluations and advancement of mine development are required to estimate Proven Mineral Reserves.


Optimized stope envelopes contain internal planned waste at zero value. External unplanned wasted was applied at 5% additional tons at zero grade for all planned tons. A minimum 5-foot buffer was placed around the worked-out stope areas. Delineation drilling is planned prior to mining in support of the short-term production mine plan and to identify areas that will require back fill prior to mining adjacent areas.


Mineral Reserves are estimated at an NSR cutoff of $80/ton at the reference point of salable mill concentrates.


Table 3: Bunker Hill Mine Mineral Reserves Estimate


Area Description Tons (t) Zn (%) Pb (%) Ag (opt) Contained Ag (koz) Contained Zn (klbs) Contained Pb (klbs) NSR
Newgard and Quill Probable 3,111,344 5.87 % 2.56 % 1.12 3,492 365,118 159,326 133.53
Plan Dilution 94,997    
Unplanned Dilution 155,567    
UTZ Probable 89,117 3.93 % 3.74 % 1.35 95 7,002 6,658 122.66
Plan Dilution 794    
Unplanned Dilution 4,445    
Total Probable 3,200,461 5.81 % 2.59 % 1.12 3,587 372,120 165,984 133.23
  Total Plan 3,360,473 5.30 % 2.40 % 1.02 3,587 372,120 165,984 126.88

(1) Plan Dilution is zero grade waste included in the designed stope shapes and probable tonnages
(2) Unplanned dilution is 5% external dilution added at zero grade
(3) Mineral Reserves stated are inclusive of all above mentioned dilutions and are factored for ore loss due to mining activities
(4) Net smelter return (NSR) is defined as the return from sales of concentrates, expressed in US$/t, i.e.: NSR = (Contained metal) * (Metallurgical recoveries) * (Metal Payability %) * (Metal prices) – (Treatment, refining, transport and other selling costs). For the Mineral Reserve Estimate, NSR values were calculated using updated open-cycle metallurgical results including recoveries of 85.1%, 84.2% and 88.2% for Zn, Ag and Pb respectively, and concentrate grades of 58% Zn in zinc concentrate, and 67% Pb and 12.13 oz/ton Ag in lead concentrate.
(5) Mineral Reserves are estimated using a zinc price of $1.20 per pound, silver price of $20.00 per ounce, and lead price of $1.00 per pound.
(6) Historic mining voids, stopes and development drifting have been depleted from the Mineral Reserve Estimate
(7) Totals may not add up due to rounding


Initial Capital Costs & Infrastructure Overview


The PFS contemplates the technical and investment requirements for, and demonstrates the robust economics of a potential restart to a sustained mining and milling rate of 1,800 ton per day. The utilization of pre-existing infrastructure and expenditures already made through August 2022 allows for a low remaining capital investment required, as detailed in the table below.


Table 4: Initial Capital Costs


($000’s) Initial Capital
Process plant 26,764
Capital development 6,370
Paste plant 6,206
Construction management & Indirects 4,034
Detailed engineering 2,798
Power feed & distribution 1,693
Mobile equipment 954
Surface upgrades & other 795
Pre-commercial production revenue (695)
Capital Costs – Total (pre-contingency) 48,920
Contingency 5,933
Capital Costs – Total 54,853


The majority of the initial capital cost relates to construction of the processing plant at an estimated pre-contingency cost of $26.8 million and harnessing the extensive mill equipment and components from Teck’s Pend Oreille site. These costs include labor, refurbishment of equipment, costs of a new mill building inclusive of clearance, geotechnical and foundational work, and costs of additional mechanical equipment and components (to ensure all aspects of the processing plant are capable of an 1,800 ton per day run rate). The layout and design of these new facilities are envisaged to be on surface and located in the main yard in an area currently occupied by the historic Bunker Hill maintenance shop. Costs related to the purchase of the process plant from Teck are not included, nor are the costs associated with its demobilization, as this activity had been completed as of August 2022.


Approximately $6.4 million has been budgeted for capital development, a moderate estimate considering the extensive, intact, pre-existing infrastructure at the mine and surface including underground workings, surface portals and shaft access points as well as the main mine office and adjacent surface buildings. As an example, the Kellogg Tunnel adjacent to the main mine office connects horizontally by rail to the underground hoisting facilities on 9-level approximately 9,500 feet from the portal. As such, pre-production capital development primarily relates to the development of an underground decline from the Wardner yard (at the 5-level) to the back of the Kellogg Tunnel (at the 9-level) to provide rubber tire access for mine equipment and all requisite access to initial stopes in readiness for commercial production, and related rehabilitation activities.


Bunker Hill’s long hole stoping method envisions the use of a paste (i.e., hydraulic) backfill plant to deliver binder-added tailings product to backfill stopes. The paste plant will also deliver both binder-added and non-binder added thickened tailings to open historic mining voids throughout the mine as a means of tailings deposition. Patterson & Cooke, North America investigated several options to handle the backfill and tails placement requirements of the project. The option with the greatest amount of operational flexibility is to locate the plant on surface. The $6.2m of capital allocated for this will include construction of a tailings thickening plant to be located in the mill/process building (in the main yard on the 9-level) and of a tailings filtration plant immediately adjacent to the building. In addition, the paste plant and pumping station will be constructed at the mine’s 5-level laydown in the Wardner yard. Surface construction of the plants will help expedite construction, lower labor costs and make binder delivery to the plant more efficient. Location of the pumping station on the 5-level of the mine (highest accessible level) allows for gravity-assisted flow to the stoping areas, almost all of which are lower in elevation. Tailings will be filtered into a filter cake material and backhauled up to the Wardner plant from the mill/process location by means of the same haul trucks used for the overland ore haulage to the mill. Once at the Wardner location, tailings filter cake material will be mixed with a binding agent and water and then pumped through the reticulation line either to open void space for deposition or mined out stopes for backfill requirements. Initial backfill test work indicates excellent backfill strengths can be produced at low binder content. Further test work will provide optimization on binder addition requirements.


Construction management (EPCM and related costs) and detailed engineering costs have been estimated at $4.0 million and $2.8m respectively. The EPCM partner is assumed to be selected and onboarded at the beginning of the capital schedule, enabling a rapid advance after a construction decision. The detailed engineering costs span the remaining engineering work to enable construction across the processing plant (including crusher and loadout facilities), paste plant (all parts) and other infrastructure requirements.


Bunker Hill has been working closely with Avista Utilities to upgrade the electrical supply infrastructure to both the main Bunker Hill yard (9-level) and Wardner (5-level) sites. As of September 2022, Avista is extending and upgrading three phase power to the Wardner site. Additional capacity will be freed up at the main Kellogg/Bunker Hill substation by redirecting loads to adjacent substations where feasible (either immediately or with minimal additional infrastructure). Capital costs for these activities are funded by the project up front and then credited back to the operational power bill over the life of the project.


Other initial capital costs include various mobile equipment (supplementing the mine contractor fleet) and miscellaneous surface upgrades.


Mine water from all levels above the 9-level naturally drains out of the Kellogg Tunnel and then flows through existing infrastructure into the Central Water Treatment Plant (CTP), owned by Idaho Department of Environmental Quality (IDEQ), for treatment. The PFS envisages a long-term agreement between Bunker Hill and the IDEQ for use of the CTP for mine water treatment requirements, and therefore does not therefore envision capital expenditure for an internal water treatment plant.


Mining Methods


The Newgard/Quill resource was optimized and scheduled utilizing the long-hole open stoping (LHOS) mining method with backfill, whereby stopes are accessed via lateral drifts driven off the Newgard ramp connecting the levels vertically. The ramps and raise systems provide ventilation, utilities, and secondary escapeway, as well as connecting the entire mine for rubber tire access. The LHOS areas are accessed primarily by new excavations and do connect to some existing levels which will be rehabilitated. Backfill requirements are provided via the surface (5-level) hydraulic fill plant and distribution system.




The PFS envisages a mill throughput increase to 1,800 tons per day from a reconfiguration whereby two larger ball mills are purchased to replace the existing ball mills procured from the Pend Oreille site; the Company has identified multiple opportunities in this regard.


The plan entails run-of-mine (ROM) ore delivered from underground to a mobile jaw crusher located at the surface portal in Wardner. The crushed ROM will be delivered to the secondary crushing circuit via truck and overland haulage route. The processing facility and secondary crushing facility will be located at surface in the Kellogg yard adjacent to the Kellogg Tunnel. Crushed ore will be fed to a fine ore storage silo ahead of the new concentrator facility that will be constructed where the existing Bunker Hill maintenance building now stands.


The PFS envisages usage of the surface footprint occupied by the existing storage building adjacent to the surface administration buildings. Geotechnical and other technical work to finalize detailed engineering designs is currently underway and will be followed by demolition of the existing surface building.


The new concentrator facility will consist of a standard primary ball milling circuit followed by a conventional differential flotation circuit for lead and zinc. A lead concentrate will be produced first, followed by zinc concentrate in conventional flotation cells with 3 stages of concentrate cleaning for each product. Concentrate dewatering and loadout will take place on the north end of the concentrator to more easily accommodate the receiving and loading of concentrate trucks.


All tailings produced in the concentrator will be filtered to produce a tailings filter cake, consequently no surface tailings pond will be required. All process water solution will be recovered and reused in the concentrator.


All freshwater makeup for the concentrator will either come from mine water sources or an internally operated water treatment processes facility within the concentrator plant.


The zinc and lead concentrates are assumed to be transported by truck to the smelting facility owned by Teck Resources Limited in Trail, British Columbia, with Teck exercising its option (as announced by the Company on March 31, 2022) to acquire 100% of the zinc and lead concentrate production for an initial term of 5 years.




SGS Lakefield was contracted to conduct additional metallurgical test work to optimize and improve previous metallurgical results. Scoping level bulk flotation tests were conducted to affirm the most effective parameters to maximize recovery and concentrate quality. This test work allowed for the establishment of ore hardness, mineralogical characteristics, grind size vs. recovery, reagent profile, and repeatable flotation performance. Locked cycle testing of representative Bunker Hill ores exhibited acceptable recovery profiles at varying head grades while producing marketable grades of concentrates. Metallurgical variability and optimization test work will continue post PFS to further refine and improve recovery and concentrate quality performance.


The current test work supports a traditional crushing and grinding circuit followed by lead and zinc flotation. The Bunker Hill ore mineralogy requires a primary grind size of approximately 80% passing 74 microns for optimum flotation recovery. Lead will be floated first while zinc is chemically depressed for recovery later in the process. The vast majority of payable silver follows with the lead and reports to the lead concentrate. Zinc is chemically reactivated and recovered post lead flotation. Test work has confirmed that 3 stages of cleaning is adequate to produce a marketable concentrate grade for both lead and zinc.


Based on the metallurgical test work and an analysis of historical metallurgical performance, the performance criteria used in the PFS consisted of the following: 1) 88.2% lead recovery to the lead concentrate at a grade of 67.0% lead, 2) 85.1% zinc recovery the zinc concentrate at a grade of 58% zinc, and 3) 84.2% silver recovery to the lead concentrate.


Operating Costs Summary


Operating cost estimates were prepared based on an 1,800 tons per day ore production rate, as summarized in the Table below for the initial 5 years of mine life.


Table 5: Summary of Operating Costs


Mining ($/t) 37.09
Processing ($/t) 21.12
G&A ($/t) 8.68
Operating Costs – Total ($/t) 66.89


Operating costs are based on experienced local contract labor and equipment for mining operations. A zero-based efficiency and cost estimate was completed based on the current underground contractors’ rates and guidance benchmarked against current development activities. Electrical power costs are based on scheduled projected loads applying an estimated power factor correction and applicable rates from Avista Utilities for all projected mine, milling and site operations. Mining costs are based LHOS methods in the majority of the Newgard, Quill and UTZ ore zones. There is a portion of limited cut-and-fill mining late in the mine plan, costs of which are reflected in total mine OPEX and the mining schedule.


Mine production will be hauled using the Newgard ramp, exit the mine at the Russel portal and be trucked overland via off-road haul trucks down to the Kellogg mill location. Thickened and filtered tails will be back hauled to the Russell site for placement underground as engineered or straight backfill.


Operating costs in Table 5 do not include smelter charges or concentrate freight costs, which have been estimated based on an outlook for the zinc and lead concentrate markets by a third-party consultant, and trucking quotes obtained. These costs have been shown separately in Table 1 above.


Cash Flow & Valuation


The project is expected to generate pre-tax free cash flow of $137 million over the initial Phase 1 mine plan (average of $27 million per year) and $130 million on an after-tax basis (average of $26 million per year) before consideration of sale proceeds from land and salvage equipment, after the initial capital expenditure period of 16 months. In addition, total estimated cash flows include approximately $11 million (net of tax) from estimated proceeds of sale of undeveloped land, processing and mobile equipment at the end of the five-year mine plan. Estimated cash flows do not include the impact of potential financing arrangements. Tax estimates include federal and state income tax, mine license tax, and property tax after consideration of Bunker Hill Mining Corp.’s existing estimated net operating loss position and other tax attributes, and were estimated by Mining Tax Plan LLC.


The ’Phase 1’ Prefeasibility Study results yield an after-tax Net Present Value (“NPV”) of $52 million using an 8.0% discount rate, or $63 million using a 5.0% discount rate, and an after-tax Internal Rate of Return of 36.0%.


Table 6 below summarizes the after-tax sensitivities of NPV and IRR to metal prices, operating and capital costs.


Table 6: NPV (8%) & IRR Sensitivities


    Metal Prices   Operating & Capital Costs

NPV (8%)

      Zinc Price ($/lb)       Operating Costs (+/- %)
      (0.20 ) (0.10 )   0.10   0.20         (20 %) (10 %)   10 % 20 %
(0.20 ) (7 ) 13   32   51   68     Total
(20 %) 102   87   72   56   40  
  (0.10 ) 4   23   42   60   78     (10 %) 92   77   62   46   30  
    14   33   52   69   87       82   67   52   36   19  
  0.10   24   43   61   78   96     10 % 72   57   42   25   9  
  0.20   34   53   70   87   105     20 % 62   47   31   15   (1 )
IRR (%)       Zinc Price ($/lb)       Operating Costs (+/- %)
      (0.20 ) (0.10 )   0.10   0.20         (20 %) (10 %)   10 % 20 %
(0.20 ) 4 % 16 % 26 % 35 % 44 %   Total
(20 %) 71 % 62 % 53 % 44 % 34 %
  (0.10 ) 10 % 21 % 31 % 40 % 49 %   (10 %) 60 % 52 % 44 % 35 % 26 %
    16 % 26 % 36 % 45 % 53 %     51 % 44 % 36 % 28 % 19 %
  0.10   22 % 32 % 41 % 49 % 57 %   10 % 44 % 37 % 29 % 21 % 13 %
  0.20   27 % 37 % 45 % 54 % 62 %   20 % 37 % 30 % 23 % 15 % 7 %



Next Steps & Opportunities


Key next steps for the project include the completion of detailed engineering for the process plant and paste plant, prior to commencement of construction. In parallel, underground development should continue in order to establish initial mining areas. Thereafter, construction is expected to commence along with the purchase of long lead time capital items and additional mining equipment.


Opportunities to further enhance financial returns include resource conversion to unlock value from Inferred Resources which remain open for expansion, further increased scale beyond the contemplated 1,800 tpd throughput rate, ongoing metallurgical optimization, and ore sorting. These opportunities are not included in the PFS economic analysis.




MineTech USA, LLC (developed the mine infrastructure, capex and opex related portions of the PFS as well as portions of the mine plan, reserves and operating schedules in coordination with Bunker Hill’s team who directed Paterson & Cooke North America for the tailings and backfill components and Barr Engineering for milling and process design. Robert Todd, P.E. is a Principal of MineTech, a registered engineer in Idaho, consultant to the Company and an Independent “Qualified Person” as defined by NI 43-101. Peter Kondos Ph.D., CEO of YaKum Consulting Inc was responsible for the processing and metallurgical testing and sections of this release and subsequent technical report and is an independent “Qualified Person” as defined by NI 43-101.


Mr. Scott E. Wilson, CPG, President of Resource Development Associates Inc. and a consultant to the Company, is an independent qualified person as defined by NI 43-101 and is acting as the qualified person for the Company. He has reviewed and approved the technical information summarized in this news release.




Under new Idaho-based leadership, Bunker Hill Mining Corp. intends to sustainably restart and develop the Bunker Hill Mine as the first step in consolidating a portfolio of North American precious-metal assets with a focus on silver.

Posted September 6, 2022

Share this news article


Altius Commits to $21 Million Investment in ARR

Altius Minerals Corporation (TSX: ALS) (OTCQX: ATUSF) is pleased... READ MORE

December 2, 2022

Midland Completes the Second Tranche of a Private Placement Totalling $3.5M

Midland Exploration Inc. (TSX-V: MD) is pleased to announce that ... READ MORE

December 2, 2022

Chibougamau Independent Mines Drilling at Berrigan Intersects Wide Mineralized Zones

Chibougamau Independent Mines Inc. (TSX-V:CBG)  (FRA:CLL1) (OTC:... READ MORE

December 2, 2022

Apollo Reports First Assay Results From Phase 2 Drilling

Silver Mineralization Continues to Expand Beneath Current Resourc... READ MORE

December 2, 2022

Orezone Declares Commercial Production at the Bomboré Gold Mine

Orezone Gold Corporation (TSX: ORE) (OTCQX: ORZCF)  is pleased t... READ MORE

December 2, 2022

We acknowledge the [financial] support of the Government of Canada.

Government of Canada Supported
Copyright 2022 The Prospector News