The Prospector News

Aya Gold & Silver Delivers Robust Boumadine PEA Highlighting High Return, Rapid Payback and a Capital-Efficient Project

You have opened a direct link to the current edition PDF

Open PDF Close
Uncategorized

Share this news article

Aya Gold & Silver Delivers Robust Boumadine PEA Highlighting High Return, Rapid Payback and a Capital-Efficient Project

Aya Gold & Silver Inc. (TSX: AYA) (OTCQX: AYASF) is pleased to announce the results of its 2025 Boumadine Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Boumadine Project located in the Kingdom of Morocco. The PEA was prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects by independent Qualified Persons, notably Lycopodium Minerals Canada Ltd and WSP Canada Inc. Please note that all financial figures in this press release are expressed in United States dollars, unless otherwise noted.

2025 PEA Highlights

Table 1: Boumadine Economic Highlights

    Base Case  Spot Prices 2
Project Economics Units Pre-tax Post-tax Post-tax
Gold Price $/oz $2,800 $2,800 $4,000
Silver Price $/oz $30 $30 $48
Initial Capital Expenditures $M $446 $446 $446
AISC1 $/oz AuEq $1,021 $1,021 $1,068
Net Present Value (NPV5%)1 $B 2.2 1.5 3.0
Internal Rate of Return (“IRR”) % 69% 47% 77%
Payback Years 1.3 2.1 1.2
NPV:Capex 3 5.0 3.3 6.6
Revenue $B 7.0 7.0 10.1
Free Cash Flow (FCF)1 $B 2.8 2.0 3.8
  1. AISC and FCF are non-IFRS financial measures and have no standardized meaning under IFRS Accounting Standards (“IFRS”) and may not be comparable to similar measures used by other issuers. Refer to “Non-IFRS and Other Financial Measures” for more information, including a detailed description of each measure.
  2. Assumed Spot Prices as of 31/10/2025.
  3. NPV:Capex ratio is the ratio of Net Present Values, discounted at 5%, to the initial capital expenditure.

 

Robust Project Economics based on an 11-year mine life:  

  • On a post-tax basis: NPV5% of $1.5 billion, an IRR of 47%, and a payback period of 2.1 years at Base Case prices, increasing to $3.0 billion NPV5%, 77% IRR, and 1.2 years payback at Spot Prices.
  • On a pre-tax basis: NPV5% of $2.2 billion, IRR of 69%, and payback period of 1.3 years under the Base Case prices, increasing to $4.5 billion NPV5%, 107% IRR, and 0.7 years payback at Spot Prices.
  • Attractive Scale, High Grade, Low Capex and Competitive All-in Sustaining Costs:  
    • Attractive scale with average annual production of 401 thousand ounces gold-equivalent in years 1 to 5 and 328 koz AuEq per year over the life-of-mine.
    • On a silver-equivalent basis, this corresponds to an average annual production of approximately 37.5 million ounces AgEq, in years 1 to 5 and 30.6 Moz AgEq over the LOM.
    • Low initial capital cost of $446 million, including $96 million in contingency
    • Highly efficient capital project with a post-tax NPV5% to Capex ratio of 3.3:1 (Base Case prices); and NPV5%to Capex ratio of 6.6:1 at Spot Prices.
    • LOM total cash costs of $928/oz AuEq and AISC of $1,021/oz AuEq.
    • Processing: 8,000 tpd conventional flotation plant producing three gold- and silver-bearing concentrates – zinc, lead, and pyrite.
    • Year 1 to 5 average head grade of 4.76 g/t AuEq, or 443 g/t AgEq.
    • LOM average head grade of 3.85 g/t AuEq, or 358 g/t AgEq.
    • This study does not include 140,000 metres 2025 ongoing drilling campaign.
    • Existing mining license on the property; feasibility study targeted for completion in late 2027.

“The Boumadine PEA confirms a highly robust, capital-efficient project that is already significantly de-risked given its conventional flowsheet and high-value concentrates,” said Benoit La Salle, President and CEO. “With industry-leading low initial capex of $446 million, a post-tax NPV of $3.0 billion at spot prices and $1.5 billion under our base case prices, both delivering industry-leading returns on invested capital, Boumadine ranks among the most attractive undeveloped precious metal projects globally. Importantly, this PEA includes only the known mineralized zones on the Boumadine mining license, which represents a small portion of our total land package. With Boumadine‘s mining license already in place, we are advancing development while continuing to drill, unlocking the broader district-scale potential,” said Benoit La Salle, President & CEO.

 

Table 2: General Project Parameters

Units Year 1-5 LOM
General
Mine Life Years 11.1
Open Pit Strip Ratio1 19.4 20.9
Throughput Capacity tpd 8,000 8,000
Total Tonnes Processed Mt 13.9 31.1
Open-pit Mt 10.4 19.4
Underground Mt 3.5 11.6
1.   Strip Ratio is the ratio of waste to mineralized material in open pit production.

 

Table 3: Processing and Production Highlights

Units Year 1-5 LOM
Processed Grade
Gold g/t 3.15 2.43
Silver g/t 85.8 72.5
Zinc % 2.05 1.91
Lead % 0.66 0.70
AuEq g/t 4.76 3.85
AgEq g/t 443 358
Production
Gold koz 1,351 2,337
Silver koz 36,894 69,874
Zinc Mlbs 468 975
Lead Mlbs 166 392
AuEq koz 2,006 3,643
AgEq koz 187,261 340,038
Avg. Annual AuEq Production koz/y 401 328
Avg. Annual AgEq Production koz/y 37,452 30,611
Recoveries
Gold % 96.1% 96.1%
Silver % 96.4% 96.4%
Zinc % 74.7% 74.7%
Lead % 82.0% 82.0%

Cautionary statement: Readers are cautioned that the PEA is preliminary in nature, it includes inferred Mineral Resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves, and there is no certainty that the PEA will be realized.

PEA Overview

Project Location

The Boumadine property is located in the Province of Errachidia, Kingdom of Morocco, approximately 220 kilometer east of the City of Ouarzazate and 70 km southwest of the City of Errachidia. Boumadine’s land package covers 339 km², with an additional 600 km² under exploration authorization, for a total area encompassing 31 permits and licenses. The Mineral Resource estimate underpinning this PEA is derived from an area of 32 km² within a single mining license, as illustrated in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Map of Boumadine Mining Permits Overlaid with Apparent Conductivity at 175Hz

Mineral Resource Estimate

The MRE in the PEA is based on the “Technical Report and Updated Mineral Resource Estimate of the Boumadine Polymetallic Project, Kingdom Of Morocco”, published on March 31, 2025, which includes 142,268 m of drilling. Since then, Aya has completed approximately 130,000 m of drilling, which is not included in this MRE.

Table 4 : Boumadine MRE, as of February 24, 2025 (1-12)

Cutoff Tonnes Average Grade Contained Metal
Ag Au Cu Pb Zn AgEq AuEq Ag Au Cu Pb Zn AgEq AuEq
NSR US$/t (kt) (g/t) (g/t) (%) (%) (%) (g/t) (g/t) (koz) (koz) (kt) (kt) (kt) (koz) (koz)
Pit-constrained
Indicated
95 3,920 94 2.99 0.13 0.84 2.95 476 5.30 11,881 377 5 33 116 60,051 667
Pit-constrained
Inferred
95 14,258 90 2.89 0.10 0.81 2.38 450 5.00 41,135 1,325 14 115 339 206,29 2,293
Out-of-pit
Indicated
125 1,249 80 2.11 0.08 0.87 2.32 358 3.98 3,216 85 1 11 29 14,382 160
Out-of-pit
Inferred
125 14,938 74 2.39 0.07 0.82 1.85 357 3.97 35,669 1,148 10 122 276 171,39 1,905
Total
Indicated
95/
125
5,169 91 2.78 0.12 0.85 2.80 448 4.98 15,097 462 6 44 145 74,433 827
Total
Inferred
95/
125
29,196 82 2.63 0.08 0.82 2.11 402 4.47 76,804 2,469 25 237 615 377,68 4,198
  1. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. The estimate of mineral resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-political, marketing, or other relevant issues. There is no certainty that mineral resources will be converted to mineral reserves.
  2. The inferred mineral resource in this estimate has a lower level of confidence than that applied to an indicated mineral resources and must not be converted to a Mineral Reserve. It is reasonably expected that the majority of the inferred mineral resource could be upgraded to an indicated mineral resource with continued exploration.
  3. The mineral resources in this press release were estimated in accordance with the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (the “CIM”) Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves Definitions (2014) and Best Practices Guidelines (2019) prepared by the CIM Standing Committee on Reserve Definitions and adopted by the CIM Council, as may be amended from time to time. The MRE with an effective date of February 24, 2025 is disclosed in a technical report for the Project dated as of March 31, 2025 and filed on SEDAR+ as of such date. The key assumptions, parameters and methods used to estimate the MRE and the identification of known legal, political, environmental or other risks that could materially affect the potential development of the mineral resources are described in such technical report.
  4. A silver price of US$24/oz with a process recovery of 89%, a gold price of US$2,200/oz with a process recovery of 85%, a zinc price of US$1.20/lb with a process recovery of 72%, a lead price of US$1.00/lb with a process recovery of 85%, and a copper price of US$4.00/lb with a process recovery of 75% were used in establishing the MRE.
  5. AgEq = Ag(g/t) + (Au(g/t) *Au price/oz*Au recovery)/(Ag price/oz*Ag recovery) + Zn(%)*Zn price/lb* Zn recovery/(Ag price/oz*Ag recovery)*685.7147973 + Pb(%)*Pb price/lb* Pb recovery/(Ag price/oz*Ag recovery)*685.7147973 + Cu(%)*Cu price/lb* Cu recovery/(Ag price/oz*Ag recovery)*685.7147973.
  6. AuEq = Au(g/t) + (Ag(g/t) *Ag price/oz*Ag recovery)/(Au price/oz*Au recovery) + Zn(%)*Zn price/lb* Zn recovery/(Au price/oz*Au recovery)*685.7147973 + Pb(%)*Pb price/lb* Pb recovery/(Au price/oz*Au recovery)*685.7147973 + Cu(%)*Cu price/lb* Cu recovery/(Au price/oz*Au recovery)*685.7147973.
  7. The constraining pit optimization parameters were US$3.5/t for mineralized material mining. US$2/t for waste mining US$89/t for processing and US$6/t for G&A totalling US$95/t for a cut-off and 50-degree pit slopes.
  8. The out-of-pit parameters used a US$30/t mining cost, US$89/t processing cost and US$6/t G&A totalling US$125/t for a cut-off. The out-of-pit mineral resource grade blocks were quantified above the US$125 NSR cut-off, below the constraining pit shell and within the constraining mineralized wireframes. Out–of-pit mineral resources exhibit continuity and reasonable potential for extraction by the long hole underground mining method.
  9. Individual calculations in tables and totals may not sum due to rounding of original numbers.
  10. Grade capping of 800 g/t Ag, 30 g/t Au, 28% Zn, 10% Pb and 1.4% Cu was applied to composites before grade estimation.
  11. Bulk density was evaluated separately for each individual vein with values ranging from 3.20 to 4.00 t/m3 determined from drill core samples and used for the MRE. For oxidized and transitional material, a bulk density of 2.65 t/m3 was used.
  12. 1.0 m composites were used during grade estimation.

 

Mining Operations 

The PEA envisions a combined open pit and underground mining operation. The Boumadine LOM plan will consist of the simultaneous mining of several open pits in Central, North and South zones concurrent with underground operations that are scheduled between Year 2 and Year 11. The overall strategy is to achieve an average production rate to maintain a processing throughput of 8,000 tpd over the LOM.

The mine plan is shown in Figure 2 below.

Figure 2: 3D Plan of the open pit and UG stopes

The open pit mineral resource used in the LOM plan is contained within six (6) open pits (two in the south, three in the north, and one in the central area) over a strike length of 6 km and is mainly located above 350 m depth from surface. The open pit mining activity, including drill and blast, loading, and haulage is based on a contract-mining operation, with a mining capacity of 50 million tonnes of total material moved per year. Approximately 20 Mt of pre-stripping is expected during construction to ensure the ramp-up.

Underground mining will begin in year two of operations. Three distinct underground mines will be operated: the North, Central and South zones. The North and Central underground mines are independent from the open pits, with dedicated declines which will be developed from surface to access high-grade areas of the North and Central areas early in the LOM. The underground mining method will be longitudinal modified avoca long hole stoping. It is contemplated that all development will be executed by a mining contractor, while mineralized inventory mining activities will be carried out by Aya.

Figure 3: Boumadine Mill Feed by Mining Source

An average of 401 koz AuEq per year over the first 5 years of operations will be produced, with the majority of mineralized inventory coming from the open pits. Significant drilling has been completed since February 24, 2025, the effective date of the MRE, which is expected to contribute to resource upside to support higher levels of production towards the end of the expected mine life and to extend the overall LOM.

Figure 4: Boumadine Annual Production Profile

 

Processing 

The flotation plant will process 8,000 tpd, for an annual throughput capacity of 2.9 Mt per year. The mine plan prioritizes strong feed grades to the mill during the initial years of production. During Years 1 to 5, high-grade material is processed, with an average grade of 4.76 g/t AuEq. From Year 8 onward, lower-grade, stockpiled material will be processed. Production during the first five years averages approximately 401koz AuEq annually.

A conventional flotation plant is planned for processing, with crushing, grinding and three flotations circuits to produce separate, saleable concentrates of zinc, lead, and pyrite. All three concentrates contain payable silver and gold. The comminution circuit consists of a primary jaw crusher, stockpile, and a semi-autogeneous mill and ball mill grinding circuit. The 6.1 MW SAG mill and 6.1 MW ball mill in closed circuit with hydrocyclones will produce a ground material with a P80 of 58 microns (µm).

Both the lead and zinc circuits consist of rougher flotation, classification, regrinding, and cleaner flotation to produce high value concentrates. The pyrite flotation circuit includes a rougher flotation circuit. All concentrates require thickening and filtration for transportation. The lead concentrate will be shipped in big bags while the zinc and pyrite concentrates will be shipped in bulk. Flotation tailings will be thickened and stored in a tailings storage facility.

Figure 5: Simplified Processing Flowsheet

 

 

Figure 6: 3D rendering of proposed processing plant 

Metallurgy

Extensive metallurgical testwork, led by SGS Lakefield between 2018 and 2025, is the foundation of the PEA and confirms a conventional flotation-based flowsheet with excellent metallurgical performance. The program included composite and variability samples, locked-cycle flotation tests, and comprehensive crushing and grinding studies, which validated the process efficiency and repeatability across mineralized domains. Total flotation recoveries are: 96.1% for gold, 96.4% for silver, 74.7% for zinc and 82.0% for lead.

Flotation demonstrates strong recoveries and concentrates quality, supporting a robust development scenario centered on concentrate sales. Complementary roaster and leaching testwork on the pyrite concentrate, conducted over several years, has also confirmed oxidation and precious metal recovery potential, suggesting a path for a roaster expansion in the future. Lab scale test results showed a total processing recovery (lead and zinc flotation, then pyrite flotation, roasting and leaching) up to 79% for gold and 85% for silver, with an average recovery of 63% for gold and 80% for silver.

The combination of high recoveries, conventional processing, and multiple commercialization pathways positions Boumadine as a technically sound and highly economic development project with significant long-term upside.

Tailings Management

The tailings storage facility is designed to accommodate approximately 18.5 Mt of flotation tailings generated over the LOM. The TSF is expected to be a valley-storage facility, utilizing the natural topography of the area and will be formed by a single earth-filled embankment, with a total footprint including the tailings deposition area of 70 ha. The TSF will be fully lined and contained with downstream phased construction, as per international standards, reiterating our commitment to the Global International Standards on Tailing Management.

The design contemplates a five-phase staged construction approach, with each phase expanding the facility every two years. This approach reduces initial capital requirements, optimizes sustaining capital expenditures over the LOM, and enhances operational flexibility and environmental performance. The design also considers water management strategies for both the operational and closure phases.  Process water from the TSF will be reclaimed and recycled to the plant to minimize freshwater consumption. Ongoing technical studies and field investigations will inform future refinement the design.

Infrastructure

A comprehensive logistics assessment was conducted in collaboration with a Moroccan based logistics company specializing in bulk transportation. The logistics study evaluated multiple transportation alternatives, including road, and rail to Boumadine. The base case selected for the PEA involves contractor operated road haulage of concentrate on national roadways to the Port of Nador-West, approximately 640 km from Boumadine. Capital costs included in the PEA includes warehousing facilities for concentrate storage at the port.

In addition to the transport network, the Project will require the construction of a dedicated 72-km electrical power line and substation to provide reliable grid power. The cost associated with the electrical infrastructure was evaluated by the state-owned utility, ONEE, and is included in the overall capital cost estimate.

Water supply

Water will be sourced from nearby towns and water wells. Treated city wastewater from several treatment plants will be pumped to the mine to be used for mineral processing. Additionally, several water dams are present in the region and the possibility to add a pipeline to one of these dams as a secondary water source will be evaluated in the feasibility study.

Capital Expenditures

The project capital cost estimate was compiled by Lycopodium, with input from WSP for mining, Epoch for the TSF and local firms for water supply, logistics and power.

Initial capital expenditures are estimated at $446M, including a contingency of $96M. These costs are summarized in Table 5. The total construction period is estimated to be two years. Average annual sustaining capital over the LOM is estimated to be $30M, which includes underground mine development costs.

Table 5: Capital Expenditures 

Capital Expenditures ($M) Initial Sustaining Total
Direct Costs 288 340 628
Open Pit Mining 54 58 112
Underground Mining 250 250
Processing Plant 167 167
Shipping Infrastructure 11 11
Electrical Line 17 17
Raw Water Supply 30 30
Tailings Storage Facility 9 22 31
TSF Closure Costs 9 9
Indirect Costs 63 63
Subtotal 351 340 691
Contingency 96 96
Total 446 340 786
   

The Boumadine PEA capital cost estimate is based on a contractor mining model, reflecting the lower upfront capital requirements and added fleet flexibility needed to support the pre-production ramp-up. Similarly, the start of underground mining activities has been scheduled to follow the start-up of operations, deferring a portion of the capital expenditures and simplifying the start of the mining operations.

Operating Costs

The PEA outlines an average cash cost of $109/t milled, or $928/oz AuEq produced. The AISC is estimated at $1,021/oz AuEq produced, positioning the project competitively within the industry cost curve. Operating cost estimates in Table 6 have been developed from first principles and benchmarked against comparable projects with similar mining methods, processing flowsheets, and geographic location. Concentrate-related costs, including refining, transportation, penalties, and treatment charges, are fully incorporated into the financial model. A 3% royalty to the state-owned Office National des Hydrocarbures et des Mines is included and taxes have been applied in accordance with current legislation.

Table 6: Operating Cost Breakdown 

Operating Costs  Year 1-5 LOM
Cost per Tonne Milled
Mining $/t milled 48.93 42.83
Processing $/t milled 17.28 17.28
G&A $/t milled 5.43 5.58
Tailings, Environmental and Water Management $/t milled 0.46 0.48
Total On-site Operating Costs $/t milled 72.10 66.16
Product shipping $/t milled 38.70 35.56
Royalties $/t milled 8.52 6.75
Mining Tax $/t milled 0.36 0.32
Total Cash Cost $/t milled 119.68 108.78
OP Sustaining Capital $/t milled 3.06 1.87
UG Sustaining Capital $/t milled 7.95 8.06
TSF Sustaining Capital $/t milled 0.95 1.01
Total Costs including Sustaining $/t milled 131.65 119.72
Operating Cost per Ounce
Total Cash Costs1 $/oz AuEq 827 928
Total AISC2 $/oz AuEq 910 1021
  1. Cash costs include mine-site operating costs such as mining, processing, and direct site G&A, as well as product shipping, royalties and mining taxes. Cash costs is a non-IFRS measure, and when expressed on a per- ounce-of-gold-equivalent produced basis, a non-IFRS ratio. Refer to “Non-IFRS and Other Financial Measures” for more information, including a detailed description of the measure.
  2. AISC is calculated as the sum of treatment and refining charges, onsite operating costs, sustaining capital costs, and closure costs, divided by the quantity of ounces equivalent sold. AISC is a non-IFRS measure, and when expressed on a per- ounce-of-gold-equivalent produced basis, a non-IFRS ratio. Refer to “Non-IFRS and Other Financial Measures” for more information, including a detailed description of the measure.

 

Concentrate Marketing

Aya has marketed and received three potential off-take agreements for the concentrates from Boumadine, providing preliminary terms for lead, zinc, and pyrite. The pyrite concentrate has generated strong attention due to its gold and silver grade and high sulfur content. Rising global demand for sulfuric acid—driven by fertilizer, chemical, and battery metals has tightened supply and improved pricing and offtake conditions for sulfur-rich feedstocks.

Table 7 highlights concentrate grades, and average payables per metal.

Table 7: Concentrate Grade, Recovery and Payables Summary 

  Gold  Silver Zinc  Lead
 Grade g/t g/t % %
Processed Grade 2.43 73 1.91 0.70
Lead Concentrate 29.9 1,892 29.6
Zinc Concentrate 1.0 134 57.4
Pyrite Concentrate 4.8 84
Recovery % % % %
Lead Concentrate 23.8 50.4 82
Zinc Concentrate 1.0 4.6 74.7
Pyrite Concentrate 71.4 41.4
Global Recovery 96.1 96.4 74.7 82.0
Payable 69% 77% 85% 90%

Proposals received support the payables used in the PEA financial model, including gold and silver credits across all concentrates. Terms are comparable between offers and within current industry values. The average payable for all metals is 73% on an AuEq basis.

 

Economic Analysis 

The PEA provides an after-tax NPV5% of $1.5 billion, an IRR of 47% and a payback period of 2.1 years from first production at base case consensus long-term gold price of $2,800/oz. The economic model also incorporates price assumptions of $30/oz silver, $1.20/lb zinc and $1.00/lb lead.

Table 8: Project Economics Summary

Project Economics Units Base Case
  Pre-tax Post-tax
Gold Price $/oz 2,800 2,800
Silver price $/oz 30 30
Zinc $/lb 1.20 1.20
Lead Price $/lb 1.00 1.00
NPV5% $B 2.2 1.5
IRR % 69% 47%
Payback Years 1.3 2.1
NPV: Capex 5.0 3.3
Revenue LOM $B 7.0
EBITDA LOM $B 3.4
Cumulative FCF LOM $B 2.8 2.0
Avg. Annual Revenue $M/y 629
Avg. Annual EBITDA $M/y 308
Avg. Annual FCF $M/y 254 176
  1. FX assumptions:  1 USD = 1.35 CAD, 1 USD = 9.5 MAD, and 1 USD = 0.87 EUR.
  2. EBITDA is a non-IFRS measure. Refer to “Non-IFRS and Other Financial Measures” for more information, including a detailed description of the  measure.

Figure 7: Annual Free Cash Flow over the LOM

 

Sensitivity Analysis

Table 9 presents the sensitivity of after-tax IRR and NPV5%, with varying gold and silver prices. It should be noted that sensitivities apply to the financial model only; pit selection, cut-off grade and processing schedules are based on a $2,200/oz gold price and would likely be redesigned.

Table 9: Sensitivity Analysis to Commodity Prices of Gold and Silver

Parameter Units Downside Base Case Spot Prices1 Upside1 Upside1
Commodity Price Sensitivity  
Gold Price $/oz 2,000 2,800 4,000 7,000 17,250
Silver Price $/oz 20 30 48 80 200
NPV5% Pre-Tax $M 803 2,224 4,479 9,581 27,451
NPV5% Post-Tax $M 490 1,475 2,963 6,330 18,123
IRR Pre-Tax % 36% 69% 107% 174% 337%
IRR Post-Tax % 22% 47% 77% 128% 256%
LOM Revenue $M 5,162 6,991 9,896 16,464 39,473
LOM EBITDA $M 1,693 3,418 6,156 12,346 34,032
FCF-Unlevered (Pre-Tax) $M 1,049 2,824 5,642 12,012 34,331
FCF-Unlevered (Post-Tax) $M 714 1,958 3,818 8,022 22,751
Payback Period (Pre-Tax) Years 2.3 1.3 0.7 0.4 0.1
Payback Period (Post-Tax) Years 3.1 2.1 1.2 0.6 0.2
NPV5%:CAPEX (Post-Tax) 1.1 3.3 6.6 14.2 40.6
1. Assumed Spot Prices as of 31/10/2025. Upside gold price assumptions referenced from Michael Oliver (October 2025) and Pierre Lassonde, Wealthion podcast, October 2, 2025 — $7,000/oz and $17,250/oz, respectively.

 

Exploration Potential at Boumadine

Significant potential exists to expand mineralization beyond the limits of the current PEA study. The Boumadine Main Trend (5.4 km), Tizi Zone (2.0 km), and Imariren Zone (1.2 km) remain open in all directions, highlighting strong opportunities for resource growth. Follow-up drilling is also planned at the newly discovered 8 km Asirem trend, underscoring the broader scale of the mineralized system. A 140,000-metre drilling program is underway, with roughly half focused on extending and infilling the known trends and the remainder directed toward greenfield exploration. This program is designed to expand the mineralized footprint beyond the PEA boundaries and to define additional zones that could support future development phases.

Next Steps

Upon completion of the PEA, the following actions are required to successfully advance the project:

  • Definition and Exploration Program: A 360,000 m drilling campaign is planned over the next two years, focused on Mineral Resource definition and expansion, with the objective of converting inferred Mineral Resources into indicated Mineral Resources required for the feasibility study and expanding known mineralized zones to further improve project economics.
  • Feasibility Study: Commencement of a feasibility study, targeting completion and public disclosure by year-end 2027.
  • Environmental and Social Assessment: The Environment and Social Impact Assessment work completed to date will form the foundation for a more detailed ESIA, expected to be completed along with the feasibility study.
  • Roaster Optionality: Continued assessment is underway to determine if an additional investment in a roaster achieves greater economic return. Further test work is required, along with determining strategic location.

Figure 8: Preliminary Schedule for Boumadine Project Development from PEA to Commercial Production

 

Conference Call Details

Aya will host a live webinar today to discuss the results with analysts, shareholders, and investors at 10:00 a.m. ET, which will be followed by a live Q&A session.

Participants may join the event via webcast at the following link: https://www.icastpro.ca/t9bhpo.
Aya encourages all participants to register in advance.

A replay will be available following the webinar through the same link or in the “Events” section of the Corporation’s website at www.ayagoldsilver.com.

 

Qualified Persons

The scientific and technical information contained in this press release has been reviewed for accuracy, compliance with National Instrument 43-101, and approved by Preetham Nayak P.Eng, Senior Study Manager for Lycopodium Minerals Canada Ltd, Benjamin Berson, P.Eng, Lead Mining Engineer for WSP and Eugene Puritch, P.Eng, FEC, CET from P&E Consultants Inc, Raphael Beaudoin, P. Eng, Vice-President, Operations, and by David Lalonde, B. Sc, P. Geo, Vice-President Exploration, each a Qualified Person as defined in NI 43-101, for accuracy and compliance with National Instrument 43-101.

The independent Qualified Persons for the PEA, as defined by NI 43-101, are

  • Preetham Nayak P.Eng., Senior Study Manager for Lycopodium Minerals Canada Ltd
  • Ruan Venter, P.Eng., Principal Process Engineer for Lycopodium Minerals Canada Ltd
  • Zuned Shaikh P.Eng., Lead Mechanical Engineer for Lycopodium Minerals Canada Ltd
  • Benjamin Berson, P.Eng, Lead Mining Engineer for WSP
  • Alex Pheiffer, PrSciNat, ESIA Lead, from SLR Consulting France SAS
  • George Papageorgiou PrEng, PhD, MSc, BSc, Eng (Civil), Wits, from Epoch Resources (Pty) Ltd
  • Eugene Puritch, P.Eng, FEC, CET from P&E Consultants Inc.
  • Antoine Yassa, P.Geo. from P&E Consultants Inc.
  • Fred Brown, P.Geo. from P&E Consultants Inc.
  • Jarita Barry, P.Geo. from P&E Consultants Inc.
  • William Stone, PhD, P.Geo. from P&E Consultants Inc.
  • Cortney Palleske, M.A.Sc., P.Eng, Principal Geomechanics Consultant from RockEng

 

Technical Report

The complete NI 43-101 Technical Report pertaining to the PEA will be filed within 45 days and will be available on Aya’s website and on SEDAR+ (www.sedarplus.ca).

The PEA is preliminary in nature, and it includes inferred Mineral Resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves, and, as such, there is no certainty that the PEA results will be realized.

 

About Aya Gold & Silver Inc.

Aya Gold & Silver Inc. is a rapidly growing, Canada-based silver producer with operations in the Kingdom of Morocco.

The only TSX-listed pure silver mining company, Aya operates the high-grade Zgounder Silver Mine and is exploring its properties along the prospective Anti-Atlas Fault, several of which have hosted past-producing mines and historical resources.

Aya’s management team has been focused on maximizing shareholder value by anchoring sustainability at the heart of its operations, governance, and financial growth plans.

For additional information, please visit Aya’s website at www.ayagoldsilver.com.

Or contact

Benoit La Salle, FCPA, MBA
President & CEO
Benoit.lasalle@ayagoldsilver.com
Alex Ball 
VP, Corporate Development & IR
alex.ball@ayagoldsilver.com

Posted November 4, 2025

Share this news article

MORE or "UNCATEGORIZED"


Appia Announces Closing of Transaction with Ultra Rare Earth Inc., Including $2,780,000 CAD Financing

Appia Rare Earths & Uranium Corp. (CSE: API) (OTCQB: APAAF) (FSE: A010) (MUN: A010) (BER: A010) ... READ MORE

November 4, 2025

Kinterra Capital Secures US $200 Million in Indicative EXIM Support to Fully Fund Pumpkin Hollow Restart and Advance Southwest Open Pit

Kinterra Capital Corp. and its operating subsidiary, Southwest Critical Materials LLC, are pleased ... READ MORE

November 4, 2025

Quimbaya Gold Closes C$14.4 Million Bought Deal Financing

Quimbaya Gold Inc. (CSE: QIM) (OTCQB: QIMGF) (FSE: K05) is pleased to announce the closing of its ... READ MORE

November 4, 2025

InZinc Intersects Exceptional Grades of 20.1% Zn, 1.7% Pb, 9.5 g/t Ag over 3.2 m in Step-Out Drill Hole Located 300 m North of B-9 Zone

InZinc Mining Ltd. (TSX-V: IZN) is pleased to report the Phase 2, 2025 drill program has achieved ou... READ MORE

November 4, 2025

North Arrow Discovers 1.56 g/t Gold Over 30 Metres at Kraaipan Including 4.26 g/t over 4m

North Arrow Minerals Inc. (TSX-V: NAR) is pleased to announce the discovery of anomalous gold from ... READ MORE

November 4, 2025

Copyright 2025 The Prospector News