First Mining Gold Corp. (TSX: FF) (OTCQX: FFMGF) (FRANKFURT: FMG) is pleased to announce the positive results of an updated Pre-Feasibility Study completed for its 100%-owned Springpole Gold Project located in Ontario, Canada. The 2025 PFS results support a 30,000 tonnes-per-day open pit mining operation.
2025 PFS Highlights12
“We are pleased to announce a very positive updated PFS at our Springpole Gold Project that reinforces its position as one of the largest and most robust undeveloped gold and silver projects in Canada”, stated Dan Wilton, CEO of First Mining. “Since our original PFS was published in 2021, we have completed significant engineering work, the results of which have been reflected in the updated infrastructure and design plans that First Mining has carried through the Environmental Assessment process. At the same time, this study demonstrates the strong leverage to gold price the Project possesses, and clearly demonstrates the potential for Springpole to be one of the largest economic drivers in northwestern Ontario for a generation to come, delivering hundreds of jobs and careers in the region, significant contracting opportunities for regional and Indigenous businesses and more than $7 billion in gross domestic product, as well as generational opportunities and potential infrastructure improvements for the Indigenous communities in the area. First Mining continues to make progress on the Federal and Provincial Environmental Assessment processes, important consultation processes with Indigenous communities, and expects to provide updates in the coming months.”
|
______________________________________ |
|
1 Base case parameters assume a gold price of US$3,100/oz, silver price of US$35.50/oz, and an exchange rate (C$ to US$) of 0.74. All currencies are reported in U.S. dollars unless otherwise specified. NPV calculated as of the commencement of construction and excludes all pre-construction costs. 2 US$4,200/oz Au spot case also based on US$51/oz Ag and 0.71 (C$ to US$). |
|
3 Initial capital costs, total cash costs and all-in sustaining costs are non-IFRS measures widely used in the mining industry as a benchmark for performance, but do not have standardized meanings under the Company’s financial reporting framework. The methods used by the Company to calculate such measures may differ from methods used by other companies with similar descriptions. See “Non-IFRS Financial Measures” at the end of this news release for further details of these measures. |
This 2025 PFS for the Springpole Gold Project was prepared by Ausenco Engineering Canada ULC of Vancouver, Canada, and a technical report summarizing the 2025 PFS will be filed by the Company on SEDAR+ within 45 days of this news release.
2025 PFS Overview
The Springpole Gold Project, located in Ontario, Canada, is one of the largest undeveloped gold resources in North America. The Project is located approximately 110 kilometres northeast of Red Lake and within 18 km of road access. The 2025 PFS provides for an updated resource model for Springpole including an Indicated Mineral Resource of 191Mt at 0.78 g/t Au for 4.8 million ounces of gold and 4.6 g/t Ag for 28 Moz of silver. The Inferred Mineral Resource category hosts 64 Mt at 0.38 g/t Au for 0.8 Moz of gold and 3.1 g/t Ag for 6.5 Moz of silver.
The 2025 PFS evaluates recovery of gold and silver from a 30,000 tpd open pit operation, with a process plant planned to include crushing, grinding, and flotation, with fine grinding of the flotation concentrate and separate agitated leaching circuits for both the reground flotation concentrate and the flotation tailings, followed by a carbon-in-pulp recovery process and a Merrill-Crowe circuit to produce doré bars. Tailings and mine rock are proposed to be securely stored at the Project’s Co-Disposal Facility designed by WSP Canada, Inc. and reviewed by the Independent Tailings and Geotechnical Review Board established for the Project in 2023. The leached sulphur containing flotation tailings are stored in a downstream constructed and raised CDF south cell which is lined. The desulphurized flotation tailings are thickened and co-disposed with mine rock in the CDF north cell.
Certain important parameters of the 2025 PFS are presented in the following table:
Table 1 : Key Parameters
|
Key Assumptions |
LOM |
Years 1 to 5 |
||
|
Base Case Commodity Prices |
US$3,100/oz Au, US$35.50/oz Ag |
|||
|
Exchange Rate (C$ to US$) |
0.74 |
|||
|
Production Profile |
LOM |
Years 1 to 5 |
||
|
Total Tonnes Processed (Mt) |
102.0 |
53.6 |
||
|
Total Tonnes Waste (Mt) |
309.5 |
217.0 |
||
|
Mill Grade – Gold, Silver |
0.94 g/t Au, 4.9 g/t Ag |
1.09 g/t Au, 5.7 g/t Ag |
||
|
Mine Life |
9.4 years |
5.0 years |
||
|
Throughput (tpd) |
30,000 |
30,000 |
||
|
Strip Ratio (waste:ore) |
3.0 : 1 |
3.2 : 1 |
||
|
Overall Recovery – Gold, Silver |
86.0% Au, 86.2% Ag |
86.7% Au, 87.1% Ag |
||
|
LOM Metal Recovered – Gold, Silver |
2.6 Moz Au, 13.8 Moz Ag |
1.6 Moz Au, 8.5 Moz Ag |
||
|
Average Annual Recovered – Gold, Silver |
281 koz Au, 1,468 koz Ag |
330 koz Au, 1,704 koz Ag |
||
|
Unit Operating Costs |
LOM |
Years 1 to 5 |
||
|
Total Cash Cost1 |
US$802/oz Au (net of by-products) |
US$742/oz Au (net of by-products) |
||
|
AISC1 |
US$938/oz Au (net of by-products) |
US$877/oz Au (net of by-products) |
||
|
Project Economics – US$3,100/oz Au Price |
Pre-Tax |
Post-Tax |
||
|
NPV5% |
US$3.2 billion |
US$2.1 billion |
||
|
IRR |
53.8 % |
40.8 % |
||
|
Payback Period |
1.4 Years |
1.8 Years |
||
|
LOM Cash Flow |
US$4.6 billion |
US$3.1 billion |
||
Economic Sensitivities
The Project economics and cash flows are highly sensitive to changes to the gold price as presented in the following tables.
Table 2 : Springpole Economic Sensitivity to Gold Price
|
Gold Price |
$2,450 |
$2,800 |
$3,100 |
$3,500 |
Spot2 ($4,200) |
|
Pre-Tax NPV5% |
US$2.0 billion |
US$2.6 billion |
US$3.2 billion |
US$4.0 billion |
US$5.6 billion |
|
Pre-Tax IRR |
37.8 % |
46.7 % |
53.8 % |
62.7 % |
82.1 % |
|
After-Tax NPV5% |
US$1.3 billion |
US$1.7 billion |
US$2.1 billion |
US$2.7 billion |
US$3.8 billion |
|
After-Tax IRR |
28.6 % |
35.4 % |
40.8 % |
47.7 % |
62.6 % |
Table 3 : Springpole Economic Sensitivity to Initial Capital Costs
|
Initial Capital |
+20 % |
+10 % |
– |
-10 % |
-20 % |
|
Pre-Tax NPV5% |
US$3.0 billion |
US$3.1 billion |
US$3.2 billion |
US$3.3 billion |
US$3.4 billion |
|
Pre-Tax IRR |
44.9 % |
49.0 % |
53.8 % |
59.4 % |
66.1 % |
|
After-Tax NPV5% |
US$2.0 billion |
US$2.1 billion |
US$2.1 billion |
US$2.2 billion |
US$2.3 billion |
|
After-Tax IRR |
34.0 % |
37.2 % |
40.8 % |
45.2 % |
50.4 % |
|
____________________________________ |
|
1 Cash costs and AISC are non-IFRS measures widely used in the mining industry as a benchmark for performance, but do not have standardized meanings under the Company’s financial reporting framework. See “Non-IFRS Financial Measures” at the end of this news release for further details of these measures. |
|
2 Spot price of US$4,200/oz Au, US$51/oz Ag and 0.71 (C$ to US$). |
Table 4 : Springpole Economic Sensitivity to Operating Costs
|
Operating Costs |
+20 % |
+10 % |
– |
-10 % |
-20 % |
|
Pre-Tax NPV5% |
US$2.9 billion |
US$3.0 billion |
US$3.2 billion |
US$3.4 billion |
US$3.6 billion |
|
Pre-Tax IRR |
49.9 % |
51.8 % |
53.8 % |
55.7 % |
57.5 % |
|
After-Tax NPV5% |
US$1.9 billion |
US$2.0 billion |
US$2.1 billion |
US$2.2 billion |
US$2.4 billion |
|
After-Tax IRR |
37.8 % |
39.3 % |
40.8 % |
42.3 % |
43.8 % |
Key Changes from 2021 Pre-Feasibility Study
Since the release of the 2021 PFS, First Mining has continued to advance Project engineering in support of addressing the Provincial and Federal Environmental Assessment processes, and the consultation processes with local and Indigenous communities. This work, which remains on-going has resulted in several updates to the Project design since 2021. The following areas reflect the key design optimizations from the 2021 PFS to date that have been brought forward in the 2025 PFS:
Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing
The 2025 PFS reflects updated recoveries for both gold and silver that resulted from updated metallurgical test work completed since the 2021 PFS. The test work focused on understanding the variability in gold and silver recoveries as well as optimizing the process flowsheet.
Based on the test work carried out, a flowsheet that includes flotation followed by leaching of reground concentrate and flotation tails presents as the most beneficial processing route for the Project. This flowsheet is based on a primary grind size of 80% passing or P80150 micrometres ahead of flotation, with flotation concentrate being reground to approximately 17 µm ahead of agitated leaching. The overall recoveries expected and used for the economics presented in the 2025 PFS are 86.0% for gold and 86.2% for silver. The increase in gold / decrease in silver recoveries in the 2025 PFS stems primarily from a better understanding of the ore variability. First Mining plans to undertake follow-up metallurgical test work to investigate additional opportunities to further increase recoveries and believes that this remains an important focus area for further improving the economics of the Project.
Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve Estimates
The updated 2025 mineral resource model prepared by SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. utilizes results from 499 core boreholes drilled by First Mining and previous property owners. The Mineral Resource Estimate at the Springpole Gold Project is shown below.
Table 5 : Mineral Resource Statement Inclusive of Mineral Reserves (effective September 30, 2025)
|
Category |
Quantity |
Grade |
Metal |
||
|
Au |
Ag |
Au |
Ag |
||
|
(Mt) |
(g/t) |
(g/t) |
(Moz) |
(Moz) |
|
|
Open Pit |
|||||
|
Indicated |
191 |
0.78 |
4.6 |
4.8 |
28.0 |
|
Inferred |
64 |
0.38 |
3.1 |
0.8 |
6.5 |
|
Notes: |
|
|
1. |
Mineral resources are reported in relation to a conceptual pit shell. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimate. All composites have been capped where appropriate. |
|
2. |
The MRE was completed under the supervision of Gilles Arseneau, P.Geo., from SRK who is a Qualified Person as defined under NI 43-101. |
|
3. |
Open pit mineral resources are reported at a cut-off grade (“COG“) of 0.20 g/t Au. COGs are based on a gold price of US$2,450/oz and a gold processing recovery of 87.2% and a silver price of US$27.50/oz and a silver processing recovery of 85.5%. |
|
4. |
Preliminary mining cost assumptions of C$2.60/tonne mined of waste, C$2.30/tonne mined of ore, and C$2.00/tonne mined of overburden, with an incremental mining cost of C$0.02/tonne/6m mined. |
|
5. |
Preliminary processing cost assumptions of C$14.50/tonne processed, general & administration assumption of C$0.90/tonne processed, stockpile cost assumption of C$0.75/tonne processed, and incremental ore mining cost of C$0.56/tonne processed. Overall pit shell slope angles ranged from 20 – 45°. |
The resource model includes mineralized material in the Camp, East Extension and Portage zones spanning 1,860 m in the southeast direction along the axis of the Portage zone and 900 m in the northeast direction perpendicular to the long axis of the Portage zone. Resource modelling includes mineralized material generally ranging from 340 m to 440 m below surface.
At the reported 0.20 g/t cut-off grade, while the Indicated mineral resource in the new MRE is comparable to the previous 2021 PFS, the new estimate reflects a 154% increase in contained gold ounces in the Inferred Resource category. The increase in Inferred ounces is largely a result of the expansion of the Portage Zone from additional drilling completed since 2022, including the discovery of additional gold mineralization in the southwest pit area.
Grade Sensitivity Analysis
The Mineral Resources of the Springpole Gold Project are variable depending upon the selected COG. To illustrate this sensitivity, the global block model quantities and grade estimates within the conceptual pit used to constrain the Mineral Resources are presented below at different cut-off grades for the Indicated Mineral Resource and for the Inferred Mineral Resource.
Indicated Block Model Quantities and Grade Estimates at Cut-off Grades
Table 6 : Indicated Block Model Quantities and Grade Estimates at Cut-off Grades
|
COG |
Quantity |
Grade |
Grade |
|
Au (g/t) |
(Mt) |
Au (g/t) |
Ag (g/t) |
|
0.10 |
218 |
0.70 |
4.2 |
|
0.20 |
191 |
0.78 |
4.6 |
|
0.25 |
176 |
0.83 |
4.8 |
|
0.30 |
160 |
0.88 |
5.0 |
|
0.35 |
145 |
0.94 |
5.2 |
|
0.40 |
131 |
1.00 |
5.4 |
|
0.50 |
107 |
1.12 |
5.9 |
|
0.60 |
87 |
1.25 |
6.2 |
|
0.70 |
70 |
1.39 |
6.6 |
|
0.80 |
58 |
1.54 |
6.9 |
Table 7 : Inferred Block Model Quantities and Grade Estimates at Cut-off Grades
|
COG |
Quantity |
Grade |
Grade |
|
Au (g/t) |
(Mt) |
Au (g/t) |
Ag (g/t) |
|
0.10 |
80 |
0.34 |
2.9 |
|
0.20 |
64 |
0.38 |
3.1 |
|
0.25 |
53 |
0.42 |
3.3 |
|
0.30 |
41 |
0.46 |
3.6 |
|
0.35 |
31 |
0.51 |
3.9 |
|
0.40 |
22 |
0.56 |
4.1 |
|
0.50 |
11 |
0.66 |
4.1 |
|
0.60 |
6 |
0.78 |
4.3 |
|
0.70 |
3 |
0.90 |
4.6 |
|
0.80 |
2 |
1.03 |
5.2 |
|
Notes: |
|
|
1. |
The reader is cautioned that the figures in the above tables should not be misconstrued with a mineral resource statement. The figures are only presented to show the sensitivity of the block model estimates to the selection of COG. Mineral Resource base case is highlighted in grey. |
Note on Inferred Resources
An Inferred Mineral Resource is that part of a mineral resource for which quantity and grade or quality are estimated on the basis of limited geological evidence and sampling. Geological evidence is sufficient to imply but not verify geological and grade or quality continuity. An Inferred Mineral Resource has a lower level of confidence than that applying to an Indicated Mineral Resource and must not be converted to a Mineral Reserve. It is reasonably expected that the majority of Inferred Mineral Resources could be upgraded to Indicated Mineral Resources with continued exploration.
Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
The estimate of Mineral Resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, sociopolitical, marketing, or other relevant issues. The quantity and grade of reported Inferred Mineral Resources in this estimation are uncertain in nature and there has been insufficient exploration to potentially convert some or all of these Inferred Mineral Resources as an Indicated or Measured Mineral Resources and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in upgrading them to the Indicated or Measured Mineral Resource category. The current proportion of the resource classified as Inferred is about 25% of total tonnes, and 14% of contained gold. The Mineral Resources in this statement were estimated using the current CIM Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves (CIM May 2014).
The Mineral Reserves for the Springpole Gold Project are based on the conversion of Indicated Mineral Resources within the current pit design. The Springpole Gold Project Mineral Reserves are shown below:
Table 8 : Springpole Proven and Probable Reserves
|
Category |
COG (g/t Au) |
Tonnes |
Grade Au (g/t) |
Grade Ag (g/t) |
Contained Au (Moz) |
Contained Ag (Moz) |
|
Proven |
0.27 |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
|
Probable |
0.27 |
102.0 |
0.94 |
4.9 |
3.1 |
16.1 |
|
Total |
0.27 |
102.0 |
0.94 |
4.9 |
3.1 |
16.1 |
|
Notes: |
||
|
1. |
This Mineral Reserve estimate is as of November 13, 2025 and is based on the new mineral resource estimate dated September 30, 2025. |
|
|
2. |
The Mineral Reserve estimation was completed under the supervision of Gordon Zurowski, P.Eng of AGP Mining Consultants Inc., who is a Qualified Person as defined under NI 43-101. |
|
|
3. |
Mineral Reserves are stated within the ultimate design pit based on: |
|
|
a. |
US$2,100/oz gold price and US$24/oz silver price. |
|
|
b. |
Pit Limit corresponds to a pit shell with a revenue factor of 0.60, corresponding to a US$1,260 /oz gold price and US$14.40/oz silver. |
|
|
c. |
A cut-off grade of 0.27 g/t Au for all pit phases. |
|
|
d. |
Preliminary mining cost assumptions of C$2.60/tonne mined of waste, C$2.30/tonne mined of ore, and C$2.00/tonne mined of overburden, with an incremental mining cost of C$0.02/tonne/6m mined. |
|
|
e. |
Preliminary processing cost assumptions of C$14.50/tonne processed, general & administration assumption of C$0.90/tonne processed, stockpile cost assumption of C$0.75/tonne processed, and incremental ore mining cost of C$0.56/tonne processed. |
|
|
f. |
Preliminary process recovery assumptions of 87.2% for gold and 85.5% for silver. |
|
|
g. |
An exchange rate of C$1.35 equal to US$1.00. |
|
|
h. |
The preliminary economic, cost and recovery assumptions used at the time of mine planning and reserve estimation may not necessarily conform to those stated in the economic model. |
|
|
4. |
Pit slope inter-ramp slope angle assumptions ranged from 22 – 54°. |
|
Capital Costs
The capital cost estimate for the proposed open pit operation in the 2025 PFS is based on the scheduled plant throughput rates, as well as a review of similar sized open pit gold operations.
The following table provides a summary of the capital cost estimate.
Table 9 : Capital Cost Estimate Details
|
Capital Cost |
US$M |
|
Mining |
302.5 |
|
Site Development |
39.6 |
|
Process Plant |
348.6 |
|
On-Site Infrastructure |
75.4 |
|
Off-Site Infrastructure |
47.0 |
|
Sub-Total Direct Costs |
813.2 |
|
Indirects |
68.6 |
|
EPCM Services1 |
70.2 |
|
Owner’s Cost |
42.9 |
|
Provisions |
127.8 |
|
Total Initial Capital |
1,104.1 |
|
Sustaining Capital |
322.6 |
|
Closure Costs (Net of Salvage) |
36.5 |
|
Total Capital Costs |
1,463.3 |
|
_____________________________________ |
|
1 EPCM = Engineering, Procurement and Construction Management. |
Mining Capital Costs
The open pit mining activities for the Project were assumed to be undertaken by a leased fleet. Mining capital costs were estimated based on a detailed equipment schedule matched to the mining production schedule.
Processing Capital Costs
The process plant was designed using conventional processing unit operations. It will treat 30,000 tpd or 1,359 t/h based on an availability of 8,059 hours per annum or 92%. The crusher plant section design is set at 75% availability and the gold room availability is set at 52 weeks per year with five operating days and five smelting days per week. The plant will operate with two shifts per day, 365 days per year, and will produce doré bars.
Initial capital costs for the processing facility were estimated to be US$348.6 million. No major plant re-build or expansion was considered during the LOM, with sustaining capital set to maintain the equipment in operating condition.
Operating Costs
Overall operating costs for the LOM are summarized below:
Table 10 : LOM Unit Operating Cost Estimate Details
|
Operating Costs |
Unit Costs |
|
Mining (US$/t mined) |
$2.57 |
|
Mining (US$/t milled) |
$9.87 |
|
Processing (US$/t milled) |
$10.72 |
|
On-Site G&A (US$/t milled) |
$2.56 |
|
Total Operating Cost (US$/t) |
$23.15 |
|
Net Cash Costs (US$/oz)1 |
$802 |
|
Net AISC (US$/oz)1 |
$938 |
Mining Costs
The 2025 PFS contemplates open pit mining undertaken by a Leased fleet. An average unit mining cost of US$2.57/tonne of material mined was used in the economics. The cost estimate was built from first principles with detailed haulage profiles, vendor quotations for equipment and consumables, and is based on experience of similar sized open pit operations and local conditions. The open pit mining costs consider variations in haulage profiles by month and by year and variable equipment requirements necessary to meet the plant production.
Processing Costs
An average cost of US$10.72/t of processed material was used in the 2025 PFS, based on the updated process flowsheet. This includes power, labour, consumables, maintenance, and supplies. An average cost of US$2.56/t was used for G&A, which includes labour, camp, water treatment costs etc. A power cost of US$0.06/kWh was assumed.
|
_____________________________________ |
|
1 Cash costs and AISC are non-IFRS measures widely used in the mining industry as a benchmark for performance, but do not have standardized meanings under the Company’s financial reporting framework. See “Non-IFRS Financial Measures” at the end of this news release for further details of these measures. |
Production Schedule and Mine Plan
Mining would occur as a series of phases within the ultimate pit with a maximum depth of approximately 322 metres. The deposit is planned to produce a total of 102.0 Mt of plant process feed and 309.5 Mt of waste (3.0:1 overall strip ratio) over a 9.4 year mine operating life. The current LOM plan focuses on achieving consistent processing feed production rates, mining of higher-grade material early in the schedule, and balancing grade and strip ratios.
Site Infrastructure
Springpole Open Pit Basin Dewatering
The deposit sits underneath a small portion of the north basin of Springpole Lake. Two dewatering dikes with a total length of approximately 1,050 metres will need to be constructed to allow this small portion of the bay to be dewatered. The dikes will have an average height of 7 metres and a maximum height of 15 metres. The area proposed to be diked and dewatered is limited and represents approximately 6% of the entire surface area of Springpole Lake. The remaining 94% will remain as it is at present during all phases of the Project. At closure, with the measures identified through the fish habitat offsetting plan, 46 hectares of new habitat will be created resulting in a net increase of 3% to Springpole Lake’s surface area for the long-term.
Co-Disposal Facility
The CDF design has evolved to allow for the disposal of PAG tailings in a dedicated tailings cell at the south end of the CDF (south cell). The north cell at the north end of the CDF, will provide an area for the co-disposal of PAG mine rock and thickened NAG tailings. The CDF will be located immediately west of the pit on an area of generally thin overburden and bedrock outcrops and the perimeter containment dams will generally be founded on bedrock which is andesite. The andesite bedrock provides good foundation characteristics (high integrity/strength and low permeability) supporting a structurally safe facility with effective seepage capture and management.
The south cell perimeter dams will be constructed with quarried rock and NAG mine rock as a downstream raise. The perimeter dams will incorporate a low-permeability liner to maintain saturated conditions during operations. The north cell will be constructed as a centre line raise perimeter dam using quarried rock and NAG mine rock. The south and north cells will be separated by an internal dam. PAG mine rock will be co-disposed with NAG tailings in the north cell. The NAG tailings will encapsulate the mine rock providing a low permeability zone to limit oxygen ingress. CDF contact water will be collected and managed in the south cell and pumped to the Central Water Management Pond located in proximity to the plant. The water stored in the CWMP will be used to supplement mineral processing and/or will be treated at the on-site effluent treatment plant prior to release.
Power Infrastructure
The Project’s electrical demand, estimated at approximately 60 MW, will be met through a new 230 kV overhead transmission line that will interconnect with the provincial grid’s existing 230 kV corridor located roughly 90 km to the southeast. To support early works and construction activities, a temporary tie-in to a 115 kV line located approximately 30 km to the south will be utilized until the permanent transmission infrastructure is commissioned.
Project Enhancement Opportunities
The 2025 PFS identified several opportunities to enhance the economics of the Springpole Gold Project, which First Mining intends to investigate as it continues to advance the Project. These opportunities include:
Qualified Persons and NI 43-101 Technical Report
The 2025 PFS for the Springpole Gold Project summarized in this news release was completed by Ausenco and will be incorporated in a NI 43-101 technical report that will be available under the Company’s SEDAR+ profile at www.sedarplus.ca, and on the Company’s website, within 45 days of this news release.
The affiliation for each of the independent Qualified Persons (as defined under NI 43-101) involved in preparing the 2025 PFS, upon which the technical report will be based, are as follows:
Data Verification
The Qualified Persons responsible for the preparation of the 2025 PFS and the technical report in respect thereof have verified their respective data disclosed in this news release, including sampling, analytical, and test data underlying the information contained in this news release. Geological, mine engineering and metallurgical reviews included, among other things, reviewing drill data and core logs, review of geotechnical and hydrological studies, environmental and community factors, the development of the life of mine plan, capital and operating costs, transportation, taxation and royalties, and review of existing metallurgical test work. In the opinion of the Qualified Persons, the data, assumptions, and parameters used in the sections of the 2025 PFS that they are responsible for preparing are sufficiently reliable for those purposes. The technical report in respect of the 2025 PFS, when filed, will contain more detailed information concerning individual responsibilities, associated quality assurance and quality control, and other data verification matters, and the key assumptions, parameters and methods used by the Company.
About First Mining Gold Corp.
First Mining is a gold developer advancing two of the largest gold projects in Canada, the Springpole Gold Project in northwestern Ontario, where we have commenced a Feasibility Study and permitting activities are on-going with a final Environmental Impact Statement / Environmental Assessment for the project submitted in November 2024, and the Duparquet Gold Project in Quebec, a PEA-stage development project located on the Destor-Porcupine Fault Zone in the prolific Abitibi region. First Mining also owns the Cameron Gold Project in Ontario and a 30% project interest in the Pickle Crow Gold Project.
First Mining was established in 2015 by Mr. Keith Neumeyer, founding President and CEO of First Majestic Silver Corp.
ON BEHALF OF FIRST MINING GOLD CORP.
Daniel W. Wilton
CEO and Director
Silver Mountain Resources Inc. (TSX-V: AGMR) is pleased to announce that it has completed its prev... READ MORE
Magna Mining Inc. (TSX-V: NICU) (OTCQX: MGMNF) (FSE: 8YD) is pleased to announce the results of a Mi... READ MORE
Sixty North Gold Mining Ltd. (CSE: SXTY) (FSE: 2F40) (OTC Pink: SXNTF) is pleased to report that on ... READ MORE
Freeport Resources Inc. (TSX-V: FRI) (OTCQB: FEERF) (FSE:4XH) is pleased to announce that, further t... READ MORE
Lion One Metals Limited (TSX-V: LIO) (OTCQX: LOMLF) is pleased to report significant new high-grade... READ MORE