
Lara Exploration Ltd. (TSX-V: LRA) (OTC Pink: LRAXF), is pleased to announce results of an independent Preliminary Economic Assessment on its 100% owned Planalto Copper-Gold deposit, located in the Carajás mining district, Pará State, Brazil.
Planalto PEA highlights include1:
“The Lara team has a track record of discovery and value creation for shareholders, and we are pleased to be able to demonstrate through this Study, that Planalto has the key technical and economic elements at a scoping level to become a mine.”, said Simon Ingram, CEO. “Furthermore, new copper mines are hard to find and often challenging to permit and build, Planalto’s excellent local infrastructure and a positive state permitting environment will benefit Planalto as it moves through technical studies towards a potential production decision. The accelerating digitalisation and energy transition megatrends are compounding increasing copper demand and improving the long-term fundamentals of the copper market, which are expected to further benefit Planalto and Lara.”
Lara Chairman, Miles Thompson added “The newly acquired Atlantica Exploration Licence has historic drill intercepts with copper mineralisation similar to that at Planalto, directly along strike to the Silica Cap PEA pit. Further exploration within the enlarged Planalto licence area has the opportunity for additional near-term discovery.”
Readers are strongly encouraged to read the Company’s Technical Report prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects in respect of the PEA which will be filed on the Company’s website and under the Company’s profile on SEDAR+ within 45 days of this news release. The Technical Report will contain important qualifications, assumptions and exclusions that relate to the PEA. The PEA has an effective date of October 15, 2025.
PEA Summary
It is anticipated that Planalto will be developed as a conventional open pit mine, with processing via a conventional crushing and grinding circuit followed by froth flotation. The process plant with nameplate capacity of 8 Mtpa(3), will produce a single saleable chalcopyrite concentrate to be transported internationally to third-party smelters. Revenue will be from copper with gold credits.
The Company retained SRK Consulting (UK) Ltd and SRK Consultores do Brasil Ltda., as Lara’s independent engineering consultants to prepare the PEA in accordance with NI 43-101.
Planalto MRE
The PEA is based upon the Planalto Mineral Resource Estimate dated July 3, 2024 which was reported above a cut-off grade of 0.16% CuEq; see Table 11. Whilst SRK considers this cut-off grade to be suitable for the PEA, the metal prices currently prevailing are higher which presents is an opportunity to use a lower cut-off grade when resource reporting and mine planning work evolve in the future. The MRE comprises:
All mineralised material processed in the PEA is from Mineral Resources that are currently classified as Indicated and Inferred. The PEA is preliminary in nature and includes Inferred Mineral Resources which make up approximately 76% of the total Mineral Resources. Inferred Mineral Resources are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as Mineral Reserves. While the Company intends to conduct further drilling with the objective of converting Inferred Mineral Resources to Indicated Mineral Resources there can be no assurance this will be successful. There is no certainty that the results and outcome of the PEA will be realized.
Mining
Planalto is characterized by consistent geological and mineralisation continuity down dip and along a 1.5 km strike length. The shallow dipping and near surface mineralisation makes it highly amenable to open pit extraction with a low waste to mineralisation strip ratio. Mineralised copper oxidised material is observed at Planalto, however neither the MRE nor the PEA includes this material.
The PEA incorporates conventional open pit mining using a truck and shovel operation where drilling, blasting, loading, and hauling are to be undertaken by mining contractors.
Over the estimated 18 year mine life, mineralised RoM (material exceeding an insitu grade of 0.16% CuEq) is envisaged to be mined for 17 years from one large pit to mine the Homestead and Cupuzeiro deposit areas and a second smaller pit to mine the Silica Cap deposit. Pre-stripping of 16.2 Mt and RoM stockpiling will be undertaken ahead of plant commissioning. The pit designs incorporate PEA stage geotechnical criteria. Bench heights have been designed to 10 m in waste and 5 m in RoM material. The primary loading fleet will consist of 3.7 m3 hydraulic excavators loading 40 t road trucks for the smaller pit and RoM in the main pit. The waste material in the main pit will utilize a larger fleet of 15 m3 hydraulic shovels loading 100 t trucks.
The smaller bench size and mining equipment for RoM mining have been designed to improve mining selectivity and reduce dilution (7% dilution and 2% losses). Locally manufactured mining equipment commonly used by local contractors has been selected to bring cost efficiency and benefits to operations and maintenance.
Over Years 1-8 inclusive, the maximum material movement is on average projected to be 20 Mtpa increasing to 35 Mtpa in later years. Over the LoM a total of 410 Mt is planned to be extracted, including 130 Mt of RoM mineralised material; 13 Mt of additional low-grade material to be processed at the end of mining; and 266 Mt waste rock that will be placed in a designated facility. Table 2 sets out the projected LoM mining schedule.
Table 2: Mining Production Schedule
| Year | RoM * (Mt) |
Cu (%) |
Au (g/t) |
Waste (Mt) |
Strip (t/t) |
Total Moved (Mt) |
| 0 | 0.8 | 0.50 | 0.07 | 16.2 | 21.2 | 17.0 |
| 1 | 7.9 | 0.45 | 0.05 | 14.1 | 1.8 | 22.0 |
| 2 | 8.9 | 0.46 | 0.05 | 13.1 | 1.5 | 22.0 |
| 3 | 8.8 | 0.46 | 0.05 | 6.2 | 0.7 | 15.0 |
| 4 | 8.7 | 0.49 | 0.05 | 6.3 | 0.7 | 15.0 |
| 5 | 8.8 | 0.50 | 0.05 | 13.2 | 1.5 | 22.0 |
| 6 | 8.7 | 0.46 | 0.05 | 13.3 | 1.5 | 22.0 |
| 7 | 8.9 | 0.38 | 0.04 | 12.1 | 1.4 | 21.0 |
| 8 | 9.4 | 0.36 | 0.03 | 11.6 | 1.2 | 21.0 |
| 9 | 9.7 | 0.36 | 0.03 | 16.8 | 1.7 | 26.5 |
| 10 | 9.0 | 0.40 | 0.05 | 26.0 | 2.9 | 35.0 |
| 11 | 8.3 | 0.43 | 0.05 | 26.7 | 3.2 | 35.0 |
| 12 | 8.9 | 0.42 | 0.04 | 26.1 | 2.9 | 35.0 |
| 13 | 8.5 | 0.43 | 0.05 | 23.5 | 2.8 | 32.0 |
| 14 | 8.8 | 0.42 | 0.05 | 13.2 | 1.5 | 22.0 |
| 15 | 8.5 | 0.41 | 0.05 | 12.5 | 1.5 | 21.0 |
| 16 | 7.6 | 0.46 | 0.06 | 12.9 | 1.7 | 20.5 |
| 17 | 3.5 | 0.42 | 0.05 | 2.5 | 0.7 | 6.0 |
| Total | 144 | 0.43 | 0.05 | 266 | 1.9 | 410 |
| * RoM includes 13 Mt of low-grade material stockpiled and processed at end of LoM | ||||||
Metallurgy Recoveries
Metallurgical recoveries used in the PEA are based on results generated from 2 phases of laboratory flotation testwork performed by Lara at Blue Coast Laboratories in Canada. The results of the Blue Coast metallurgical testwork were used in a steady-state process simulation software (USIM PAC), to develop a plant flowsheet and mass balance, with forecast concentrate quantity and quality based on treating 8 Mtpa. Results indicated that Planalto chalcopyrite mineralisation has the metallurgical characteristics to potentially produce a clean quality saleable copper-gold concentrate.
Processing and Tailings
The PEA assumes the plant will process RoM during the following stages, 0.6 Mt during commissioning, 7.5 Mt in Year 1 and 8 Mt in Year 2 through Year 18.
A traditional copper flotation process flow sheet has been adopted, incorporating a conventional semi-autogenous grinding mill followed by 2 ball mills at a target grind size of 80% less than 75 μm. Initial testing indicates that the RoM mineralisation is hard. Fine material feeds into rougher flotation cells, where a proportion of the product is reground to achieve improved liberation and separation of chalcopyrite, which is then thickened, filter pressed and collected as copper-gold concentrate. The gangue is discarded and stored as tailings. The Cupuzeiro deposit is expected to contain slightly elevated pyrite; when this material is fed to the processing plant it will be necessary to divert the pyrite-rich cleaner-scavenger tailings to a dedicated pyrite tailings facility so that any subsequent interaction with the natural environment can be appropriately managed. A water treatment plant is included to treat return water from the tailings dam for re-use in the process plant, reducing water consumption.
Equipment selection was undertaken in conjunction with major equipment manufacturers and has been costed based on quotes received from Brazilian and international manufacturers.
Based on average feed grades, the plant would be expected to achieve average metallurgical recoveries of 90.9% for copper and 51.1% for gold producing a floatation concentrate containing 28% copper and minor gold.
Table 3 presents the estimated LoM plant feed and concentrate production schedule, for the 18-year LoM.
Table 3: Processing and Concentrate Production Schedule
| Year | Plant Feed (Mt) |
Cu (%) |
Au (g/t) |
Cu concentrate (kt) |
Cu (kt) |
Au (koz) |
| 1 | 7.5 | 0.49 | 0.06 | 120.4 | 33.7 | 6.9 |
| 2 | 8.0 | 0.49 | 0.05 | 127.7 | 35.8 | 7.2 |
| 3 | 8.0 | 0.49 | 0.06 | 127.0 | 35.6 | 7.4 |
| 4 | 8.0 | 0.52 | 0.05 | 134.8 | 37.7 | 7.2 |
| 5 | 8.0 | 0.53 | 0.06 | 137.3 | 38.4 | 7.5 |
| 6 | 8.0 | 0.48 | 0.05 | 125.1 | 35.0 | 7.1 |
| 7 | 8.0 | 0.40 | 0.04 | 103.4 | 28.9 | 5.4 |
| 8 | 8.0 | 0.39 | 0.03 | 100.8 | 28.2 | 4.2 |
| 9 | 8.0 | 0.40 | 0.04 | 103.9 | 29.1 | 4.8 |
| 10 | 8.0 | 0.43 | 0.05 | 112.3 | 31.5 | 6.1 |
| 11 | 8.0 | 0.44 | 0.05 | 113.2 | 31.7 | 6.2 |
| 12 | 8.0 | 0.45 | 0.05 | 116.4 | 32.6 | 6.2 |
| 13 | 8.0 | 0.45 | 0.05 | 115.7 | 32.4 | 6.3 |
| 14 | 8.0 | 0.44 | 0.05 | 114.7 | 32.1 | 6.3 |
| 15 | 8.0 | 0.43 | 0.06 | 111.3 | 31.2 | 7.3 |
| 16 | 8.0 | 0.44 | 0.06 | 115.4 | 32.3 | 7.9 |
| 17 | 8.0 | 0.28 | 0.03 | 73.9 | 20.7 | 4.3 |
| 18 | 8.2 | 0.18 | 0.02 | 46.9 | 13.1 | 2.8 |
| Total | 144 | 0.43 | 0.05 | 2,000 | 560 | 111 |
The PEA envisages a tailings storage facility located to the south-east of the mine site which is entirely within Lara’s licence area. The TSF comprises two cells which would be utilised for conventional slurry tailings with storage for the first 13 years of tailings production. During Year 13 of operations, a new deep cone thickener would be installed close to the TSF. Tailings deposition would switch to paste (65-70% solids w/w) from Year 14 which would accommodate remaining LoM tailings. This approach is utilised successfully for thickened tailings deposition at the nearby Sossego mine and is likely to be viewed favourably by regulatory authorities. Furthermore, there will be a small, dedicated storage facility for pyrite-rich tailings.
Infrastructure
The PEA envisages a number of infrastructure requirements for the Project which have been designed and costed at a scoping level, including power supply, processing plant, tailings storage facility, waste rock dump, water management channels including a river diversion, process water supply pond, water treatment plant, a 4 km site access road and bridge, haul roads, RoM pad and low grade stockpile and miscellaneous site utilities.
Power in Brazil’s national grid is 85% from renewable sources and is relatively low cost by international standards. The electrical supply connection is based on a quotation from the local electrical utility to install and connect a supply of 138 kV to the Project to meet a demand of up to 52.5 MW. There are a number of power connection options due to the favourable location, just 4 km from the existing high tension (500 and 230 kV) powerlines and proximity to major substations. Further trade off studies will investigate opportunities for a direct grid connection to potentially reduce, transmission line capital costs, transmission losses and tariffs.
This PEA assumes concentrate will be trucked by road approximately 680 km to the port of Vila do Conde (Barcarena, Pará State) where it will be loaded onto ocean going vessels for shipping.
Water Management
The tropical climate and the topographic situation of the Project area mean that surface water management will be key to de-risking mining operations and safeguarding the natural environment. The PEA envisages numerous diversion channels to manage surface water runoff and water levels in the nearby creeks particularly during intense storm events. It also gives consideration to treating all water that has been in contact with sulphide-bearing rock. A water treatment plant has been designed and costed at a scoping level. A provisional water balance for the site, including the requirement for water in the processing plant has been estimated.
Environment, Permitting and Social Considerations
Lara’s approvals roadmap includes an application for the Preliminary License (LP) in Q3 2026, an application for the Installation License (LI) in Q4 2028, and the Operating Licence (LO) for the start of operations for 2030.
Building on environmental information collected from the Project area in 2021, CLAM Engenharia has commenced an environmental impact assessment which is due to be completed in Q2 2026. Field studies will include air quality, springs survey, water quality, flora and fauna, socio-economic and speleology (caves). The need for studies on archaeology, historical and cultural heritage will be determined following consultation with regulatory authorities.
As the EIA improves the understanding of the environmental and social context of the Project, strong links between Project development and ESG workstreams will be needed to embed sustainability into technical decision making. Early and effective integration of these workstreams will likely improve permitting timeframes and outcomes.
Ongoing key issues include acquisition of surface rights, minimizing the Project footprint to avoid impacts on existing land use and protected areas, characterizing and minimising geochemical risks from mine waste, appropriate design of mine waste facilities, minimising impacts on surface water and groundwater users and Project affected people. Climate change considerations will also need to be considered in future stages of Project development, particularly minimising carbon emissions from the future operation and demonstrating resilience to future climate scenarios in operational and closure designs.
A provisional estimated closure cost of US$ 18.3 million has been allowed for in the PEA.
Life of Mine Production Plan
The estimated LoM production under the PEA is summarized in Figure 1 and Table 4.

Figure 1: Mining and Cu in Concentrate Profile
Note: Year 0 is the pre-stripping year, with some RoM mined and stockpiled
Table 4: LoM Production Summary
| Units | Value | |
| Production Rates | ||
| Peak mining rate (ore+waste) | Mt/yr | 35.0 |
| Peak processing | Mt/yr | 8.0 |
| Mine Production | ||
| Total mined | Mt | 410 |
| Waste | Mt | 266 |
| RoM | Mt | 130 |
| Low grade material | Mt | 13.4 |
| Strip ratio | t/t (waste/RoM) | 1.9 |
| Payable metal | ||
| Copper | kt | 540 |
| Gold | koz | 99.7 |
Capital Costs
The estimated initial capital for construction and ramp-up, together with expected sustaining capital and closure costs, is presented in Table 5. The costs have been estimated to an accuracy of -30% / +50%. A 20% contingency has been added to the initial capital and the mine closure costs.
Table 5: Capital Costs
| Initial (US$ million) |
Sustaining (US$ million) |
Total (US$ million) |
|
| Mining Pre-Strip | 28.5 | — | 28.5 |
| Processing Plant | 238.5 | 85.9 | 324.4 |
| Tailing Management Facility | 13.1 | 62.1 | 75.2 |
| Water Management | 15.0 | — | 15.0 |
| On-Site Infrastructure | 28.3 | — | 28.3 |
| Power Supply | 20.6 | — | 20.6 |
| Construction Support | 29.5 | — | 29.5 |
| EPCM | 47.3 | — | 47.3 |
| Owners Costs | 33.7 | — | 33.7 |
| Mine Closure | — | 18.3 | 18.3 |
| Contingency | 90.9 | 3.7 | 94.6 |
| Total | 546 | 170 | 716 |
Operating Costs
The estimated Planalto operating costs represent the onsite costs to produce copper concentrate; additional costs associated with the concentrate transport are captured in the net smelter return calculation. Projected site operating costs are presented in Table 6. The average life-of-mine operating cost of material moved is US$3.04/t moved.
Table 6: Operating Costs
| Description | Unit | Cost |
| Mining | US$/t ex-pit | 3.04 |
| Mining | US$/t processed | 8.34 |
| Processing | US$/t processed | 7.66 |
| Tailings | US$/t processed | 0.13 |
| G&A | US$/t processed | 1.62 |
| Total | US$/t processed | 17.75 |
SUDAM Taxation Benefit
Companies located in the Amazon region may benefit from certain tax incentives. SUDAM is an administratively and financially independent federal government agency that oversees development in the Amazon region. The region includes the state of Pará in which the Project is located. Under the concession program, companies can receive either partial or complete tax exemption on income taxes for Brazilian companies.
The tax exemption applies only to income from facilities operating in the designated region and consists of a reduction of 75% off the regular corporate income tax (25%). For the purposes of the PEA, the financial model factors in a reduction of the corporate income tax rate plus social contribution of 34% (25% + 9%) to the 15.25% (25% * 0.25% + 9%) rate available under the SUDAM regime for the Project. The concession is available for an initial period of 10 years of operation.
The PEA assumes that the Planalto Project would be eligible for SUDAM tax exemption, but this can only be confirmed once an application has been submitted and approved.
Metal Price Assumptions and Payability
Metal prices used for the PEA reflect a long term, real basis. These are included in Table 7 alongside 3 year historic prices, long-term consensus forecast prices and current spot prices. CMF prices have been sourced from SCP resource Finance, a UK based financial institution with extensive experience in the copper-gold mining sector that analyses data from Bloomberg and FactSet, where the 2029 median price has been selected. The PEA has been prepared on a 100% equity funding basis.
Table 7: Metal Price Assumptions
| Commodity | PEA Prices | 3yr Historic Price to 15 Oct 2025 | Consensus Long Term | Spot Price 15 Oct 2025 |
| Copper | US$ 9,500/t | US$9,250 | US$ 10,494/t | US$ 11,067/t |
| Gold | US$ 2,500/oz | US$ 2,434/oz | US$ 2,752/oz | US$ 4,163/oz |
The payabilities applied to the economic model were benchmarked from publicly available data from various other mines selling copper-gold concentrates through a third-party refiner, inclusive of treatment charges. The economic analysis assumes all handling and logistics costs associated with shipping of concentrates to an Asian smelter. The smelter payment terms applied in the PEA are detailed in Table 8.
Table 8: Smelter Terms
| Metal | Payability (%) | Treatment Charge | Refining Charge |
| Cu | 96.6 | US$ 55/dmt (4) con | US$ 0.055/lb Cu |
| Au | 90.0 | – | US$ 5/oz Au |
Economic Analysis
The cash flow model was based on the assumed production schedule, associated metal grades, metallurgical recoveries and capital and operating costs outlined in this news release. Table 9 shows the projected Planalto PEA highlights.
Table 9: PEA Financial Highlights
| Key Unit Costs | ||
| Total site costs* | US$/lb Cu payable | 2.14 |
| Government royalties | US$/lb Cu payable | 0.08 |
| Total adjusted operating costs* | US$/lb Cu payable | 2.54 |
| All in sustaining costs* | US$/lb Cu payable | 2.70 |
| Capital Costs | ||
| Initial | US$ million | 546 |
| Sustaining | US$ million | 148 |
| Closure cost | US$ million | 22 |
| Total capital cost | US$ million | 716 |
| Financial Evaluation | ||
| Average annual net revenue* | US$ million | 259 |
| Average annual free cashflow* | US$ million | 91 |
| After-tax NPV @ 8% discount | US$ million | 378 |
| After-tax IRR | % | 21.0% |
| Initial capital/NPV ratio* | 1:1 | 1.44 |
| Payback** | Years | 3.5 |
*This is a non-IFRS measure. See “Non-IFRS Financial Performance Measures” below; **Payback from start of production
Sensitivity Analysis
The sensitivity analysis of the Planalto Project’s NPV to the discount rate is presented in Table 10 and 11.
Table 10: Sensitivity Analysis to Discount Rate
| Discount Rate | Unit | NPV Sensitivity to Discount Rate |
| 6% | US$ million | 495 |
| 8% | US$ million | 378 |
| 10% | US$ million | 284 |
Table 11: Sensitivity Analysis to Metal Price
| Copper Price | Gold Price | NPV 8% After Tax Sensitivity to Metal price (US$M) |
IRR After Tax Sensitivity to Metal price |
| US$/t | US$/oz | ||
| 9,2501 | 2,434 | 328 | 20% |
| 9,500 2 | 2,500 | 378 | 21% |
| 10,500 3 | 2,750 | 582 | 27% |
| 11,000 4 | 4,000 | 724 | 30% |
1: 3 year historic average, 2: PEA prices, 3: Consensus long term; 4: Spot Prices on 15 October 2025 – see Table
The PEA is based on the Company’s MRE which is dated July 3, 2024. The effective date of the PEA is October 15, 2025.
Project Opportunities
Project Risks
Planalto Mineral Resource Statement
The Planalto Mineral Resource statement dated July 3, 2024 is presented in Table 11. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. For further information please refer to the Technical Report on a Mineral Resources Estimate for the Planalto Project, Canaã dos Carajás, Pará, Brazil, September 2024 with effective date of July 3, 2024 available on SEDAR+ (www.sedarplus.ca) and the Company’s website www.laraexploration.com.
Table 11: Planalto Mineral Resource Statement, July 03, 2024
| Resource Category |
Domain | Tonnage (Mt) |
Cu Grade (%) |
CuEq Grade (%) |
Au Grade (g/t) |
Cu (kt) |
Cu (Mlb) |
Au (koz) |
| Indicated | Main Mineralization | 47.7 | 0.53 | 0.56 | 0.06 | 253 | 557 | 92 |
| Host Rock Mineralization | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Total Indicated | 47.7 | 0.53 | 0.56 | 0.06 | 253 | 557 | 92 | |
| Inferred | Main Mineralization | 77.7 | 0.51 | 0.54 | 0.06 | 396 | 874 | 149.9 |
| Host Rock Mineralization | 76.3 | 0.2 | 0.22 | 0.03 | 153 | 336 | 73.6 | |
| Total Inferred | 154.0 | 0.36 | 0.38 | 0.04 | 549 | 1210 | 223.5 | |
Notes related to the Mineral Resource Estimate:
Technical Information and Qualified Persons
The following persons are the Qualified Persons under NI 43-101 that are responsible for the PEA and have reviewed and approved the scientific and technical information contained in this news release:
All of the foregoing persons are independent Qualified Persons, as defined under NI 43-101.
Details of the PEA will be provided in a technical report prepared in accordance with NI 43-101 with an effective date of October 15, 2025, which will be filed on the Company’s website and under the Company’s profile on SEDAR+ within 45 days of this news release.
About Lara Exploration
Lara is an exploration company, advancing its 100%-owned Planalto Copper-Gold Project in the Carajás Mineral Province of northern Brazil, with an open pittable Mineral Resource detailed in a NI 43-101 Technical Report filed on October 17, 2024. Lara follows the Prospect and Royalty Generator business model, which aims to minimize shareholder dilution and financial risk by generating prospects and exploring them in joint ventures funded by partners, retaining a minority interest and or a royalty. The Company currently holds a diverse portfolio of prospects, deposits and royalties in Brazil, Peru and Chile. Lara’s common shares trade on the TSX Venture Exchange under the symbol “LRA”.
Silver Bullet Mines Corp. (TSX-V: SBMI) (OTCQB: SBMCF) is pleased... READ MORE
Avalon Advanced Materials Inc. (TSX: AVL) (OTCQB: AVLNF) is pleas... READ MORE
Allied Gold Corporation (TSX: AAUC) (NYSE: AAUC) is pleased to an... READ MORE
Pasinex Resources Limited (CSE: PSE) (FSE: PNX) is pleased to ann... READ MORE
Lion One Metals Limited (TSX-V: LIO) (OTCQX: LOMLF) is pleased to... READ MORE