The Prospector News

Thunder Gold Intersects Continuous Gold Mineralization Averaging 1.178 g/t Au Over 102.0 Metres at Tower Mountain, Ontario

You have opened a direct link to the current edition PDF

Open PDF Close
Uncategorized

Share this news article

Thunder Gold Intersects Continuous Gold Mineralization Averaging 1.178 g/t Au Over 102.0 Metres at Tower Mountain, Ontario

 

 

 

 

 

Thunder Gold Corp. (TSX-V: TGOL) (FSE: Z25) (OTCQB: TGOLF) is pleased to announce the following exploration and infill diamond drill results from the Bench Target, at the Company’s flagship Tower Mountain Property, 40 kilometres west of Thunder Bay, Ontario.

 

Highlights:

  • TM26-221 intersected 1.178 g/t Au over 102.0 metres;
  • TM26-221 terminated in mineralization averaging 0.785 g/t Au over 12.0 metres outside the current optimized pit limit;
  • TM26-220, 200-metres above TM26-221, intersected 0.551 g/t Au over 75.0 metres;
  • Results continue to demonstrate good to very good spatial and empirical correlation to the 2026 Mineral Resource Estimate (‘MRE”);
  • Mineralization remains open at depth; and
  • The Company is increasing the planned drilling at Tower Mountain based on the continuous mineralization defined by the latest drill holes.

 

TM26-216, 220 and 221 were drilled on a common section, testing Inferred Resources in the central portion of the Bench-3738-Ellen (“B-E“) trend (Reference Table 1.0 and Figure 1.0). Table 2.0 summarizes the highlights of the three holes that are the subject of this release.

 

Wes Hanson, President and CEO states, “In the past two months we have completed ten infill drill holes targeting the main B-E trend, a 700-metre long, 200-metre-wide zone of variably brecciated and altered volcanic and intrusive rocks west of the Tower Mountain Intrusive Complex. Collectively, these holes have intersected 3.3 kilometres of continuous gold mineralization, averaging 0.468 g/t Au, as predicted by our 2026 Mineral Resource Estimate. The system outcrops at surface and is currently drill confined at a depth of, 400 metres. Our infill drilling, on 100-metre centres, not only suggest that the system continues at depth but also, that it may be strengthening with longer, continuous intervals over 1.0 g/t Au intersected more frequently. I am pleased to note that the Infill drilling clearly demonstrates the continuity, consistency and scalability of the property that caught my attention in 2022.”

 

“I am also pleased to report that the MagnetoTellurics Airborne Survey has been completed and the results are currently being reviewed / interpreted. We expect the results will highlight alteration changes at depth along the B-E trend to depths of up to 2.0 kilometres. We are also excited to see what the survey identifies within the 6.0 kilometres of untested halo circumference surrounding the TMIC.”

 

Table 1.0 provides the location and orientation of holes TM26-216, 220 and 221

 

Figure 1.0 is a plan view showing the location of the drill holes reported in this news release.

 

Table 1.0 – B-E Target – Drill Hole Location Bearing and Dip

 

Hole ID Easting Northing Elevation Bearing Dip TD
TM26-216 300719 5377690 453.5 40 -48.1 351
TM26-220 300660 5377601 450 40 -50 300
TM26-221 300555 5377457 471 40 -50.1 450

 

Figure 1.0 Bench Target Diamond Drill Plan – October 12, 2026

 

TM26-216

 

TM26-216 is the northern most hole on the common drill section (Reference Figures 1.0 and 2.0). It was collared north of the interpreted B-E contact, targeting scattered, low-grade gold values predicted in the model. TM26-216 intersected scattered, narrow (less than 30-metre long) intervals of mineralization at, or slightly higher than the 2026 MRE cut-off grade (0.19 g/t Au). The length, weight averaged drill hole returned an average grade slightly higher than the model predicted grade (Reference Figure 4.0).

 

TM26-220

 

TM26-220 was a step-back hole collared 100 metres south of TM26-216, targeting the upper portion of the B-E trend at the interpreted northern contact (Reference Figures 1.0 and 2.0). This hole collared and remained in semi-continuous mineralization to the end of the hole. TM26-220 intersected 75.0 metres averaging 0.551 g/t Au from 31.5 metres depth. Individual sample results range from trace to a high of 2.60 g/t Au. The hole remained in low-grade mineralization to the end of the hole, suggesting that the northern contact may be 75-100 metres further north from where it is currently interpreted (Reference Figure 2.0).

 

The length, weight averaged drill hole grade is slightly lower than the model predicted grade (Reference Figure 3.0).

 

TM26-221

 

TM26-221 was a 200-metre step back hole collared 200 metres south of TM26-220 (Reference Figures 1.0 and 2.0). This hole targeted the interpreted southern B-E contact. The results suggest that the southern contact is shifted approximately 50 metres to the south of the interpreted contact (Reference Figure 2.0).

 

TM26-221 intersected the southern B-E contact at a depth of 198.0 metres and remained in continuous, homogeneous gold mineralization to a depth of 357.0 metres, averaging 0.894 g/t Au. A large, barren mafic dike disrupts the mineralization from 357.0 metres to 438.0 metres before transitioning into continuous, homogeneous mineralization from 438.0 metres to the end-of-hole at 450.0 metres depth (Reference Tables 2.0 and 3.0).

 

The high grade gold intersected at the end-of-hole suggests that the hole failed to exit the target and that both the northern contact as well as the northern pit limit could extend to the north.

 

Figure 2.0 – Cross Section TM26-216,220 and 221

 

Gold grades ranged from trace (expressed as 0.003 g/t Au in Table 3.0) to a maximum of 3.61 g/t Au from the southern contact to the end-of-hole. The length, weight averaged drill hole grade is slightly lower than the model predicted grade (Reference Figure 3.0).

 

Additional drilling is planned on this section.

 

Table 2.0 – TM26-216, 220 and 221 Significant Results

 

Hole ID From To Length Grade True Width
(m) (m) (m) (Au g/t) (m)
TM26-216 27.0 34.5 7.5 0.273 Unknown
and 67.5 69.0 1.5 0.603 Unknown
and 81.0 351.0 270.0 0.150 Unknown
includes 123.0 132.0 9.0 0.241 Unknown
and 187.5 189.0 1.5 3.480 Unknown
and 202.5 204.0 1.5 1.260 Unknown
and 225.0 234.0 9.0 0.217 Unknown
and 243.0 268.5 25.5 0.207 Unknown
and 297.0 321.0 24.0 0.199 Unknown
TM26-220 3.8 300.0 296.2 0.268 Unknown
includes 3.8 19.5 15.7 0.236 Unknown
and 19.5 31.5 12.0 0.072 Unknown
and 31.5 106.5 75.0 0.551 Unknown
and 106.5 117.0 10.5 0.092 Unknown
and 117.0 135.0 18.0 0.281 Unknown
and 135.0 172.5 37.5 0.168 Unknown
and 172.5 204.0 31.5 0.307 Unknown
and 204.0 265.5 61.5 0.070 Unknown
265.5 300.0 34.5 0.210 Unknown
TM26-221 6.5 178.5 172.0 0.027 Unknown
and 178.5 183.0 4.5 0.903 Unknown
and 183.0 198.0 15.0 0.057 Unknown
and 198.0 357.0 159.0 0.894 118.0
includes 198.0 214.5 16.5 0.220 12.2
and 214.5 234.0 19.5 0.646 14.5
and 234.0 240.0 6.0 0.065 4.5
and 240.0 255.0 15.0 0.354 11.1
and 255.0 357.0 102.0 1.178 75.7
and 357.0 402.0 45.0 0.036 Unknown
and 402.0 426.0 24.0 0.212 Unknown
and 426.0 438.0 12.0 0.011 Unknown
and 438.0 450.0 12.0 0.785 Unknown

True Width is estimated where sufficient data allows.
True Width is NOT estimated where there is currently insufficient data to allow estimation.

 

Table 3.0 -TM26-221

 

From (m) To (m) Au g/t From (m) To (m) Au g/t From (m) To (m) Au g/t
6.5 7.5 0.110 66.0 67.5 0.013 126.0 127.5 0.057
7.5 9.0 0.060 67.5 69.0 0.011 127.5 129.0 0.019
9.0 10.5 0.036 69.0 70.5 0.013 129.0 130.5 0.052
10.5 12.0 0.045 70.5 72.0 0.018 130.5 132.0 0.028
12.0 13.5 0.183 72.0 73.5 0.015 132.0 133.5 0.040
13.5 15.0 0.087 73.5 75.0 0.046 133.5 135.0 0.061
15.0 16.5 0.048 75.0 76.5 0.011 135.0 136.5 0.041
16.5 18.0 0.028 76.5 78.0 0.023 136.5 138.0 0.018
18.0 19.5 0.031 78.0 79.5 0.010 138.0 139.5 0.059
19.5 21.0 0.030 79.5 81.0 0.013 139.5 141.0 0.069
21.0 22.5 0.019 81.0 82.5 0.005 141.0 142.5 0.052
22.5 24.0 0.053 82.5 84.0 0.008 142.5 144.0 0.016
24.0 25.5 0.036 84.0 85.5 0.008 144.0 145.5 0.010
25.5 27.0 0.034 85.5 87.0 0.007 145.5 147.0 0.003
27.0 28.5 0.041 87.0 88.5 0.025 147.0 148.5 0.010
28.5 30.0 0.048 88.5 90.0 0.011 148.5 150.0 0.006
30.0 31.5 0.051 90.0 91.5 0.006 150.0 151.5 0.003
31.5 33.0 0.018 91.5 93.0 0.010 151.5 153.0 0.006
33.0 34.5 0.012 93.0 94.5 0.006 153.0 154.5 0.003
34.5 36.0 0.006 94.5 96.0 0.003 154.5 156.0 0.011
36.0 37.5 0.003 96.0 97.5 0.003 156.0 157.5 0.016
37.5 39.0 0.008 97.5 99.0 0.007 157.5 159.0 0.003
39.0 40.5 0.048 99.0 100.5 0.003 159.0 160.5 0.006
40.5 42.0 0.113 100.5 102.0 0.005 160.5 162.0 0.046
42.0 43.5 0.014 102.0 103.5 0.003 162.0 163.5 0.027
43.5 45.0 0.007 103.5 105.0 0.005 163.5 165.0 0.027
45.0 46.5 0.016 105.0 106.5 0.005 165.0 166.5 0.009
46.5 48.0 0.016 106.5 108.0 0.024 166.5 168.0 0.012
48.0 49.5 0.014 108.0 109.5 0.034 168.0 169.5 0.045
49.5 51.0 0.011 109.5 111.0 0.003 169.5 171.0 0.146
51.0 52.5 0.007 111.0 112.5 0.003 171.0 172.5 0.018
52.5 54.0 0.005 112.5 114.0 0.003 172.5 174.0 0.017
54.0 55.5 0.006 114.0 115.5 0.003 174.0 175.5 0.012
55.5 57.0 0.023 115.5 117.0 0.003 175.5 177.0 0.010
57.0 58.5 0.033 117.0 118.5 0.010 177.0 178.5 0.086
58.5 60.0 0.016 118.5 120.0 0.045 178.5 180.0 1.880
60.0 61.5 0.018 120.0 121.5 0.073 180.0 181.5 0.185
61.5 63.0 0.015 121.5 123.0 0.029 181.5 183.0 0.643
63.0 64.5 0.010 123.0 124.5 0.021 183.0 184.5 0.163
64.5 66.0 0.009 124.5 126.0 0.187 184.5 186.0 0.062

 

 

Table 3.0 -TM26-221 (continued)

 

From (m) To (m) Au g/t From (m) To (m) Au g/t From (m) To (m) Au g/t
186.0 187.5 0.022 246.0 247.5 0.406 306.0 307.5 1.260
187.5 189.0 0.030 247.5 249.0 0.628 307.5 309.0 1.050
189.0 190.5 0.044 249.0 250.5 0.218 309.0 310.5 1.730
190.5 192.0 0.045 250.5 252.0 0.034 310.5 312.0 0.872
192.0 193.5 0.053 252.0 253.5 0.153 312.0 313.5 1.440
193.5 195.0 0.026 253.5 255.0 0.284 313.5 315.0 1.280
195.0 196.5 0.045 255.0 256.5 1.400 315.0 316.5 1.540
196.5 198.0 0.077 256.5 258.0 1.340 316.5 318.0 1.140
198.0 199.5 0.253 258.0 259.5 0.420 318.0 319.5 1.020
199.5 201.0 0.080 259.5 261.0 0.949 319.5 321.0 0.918
201.0 202.5 0.186 261.0 262.5 0.270 321.0 322.5 2.450
202.5 204.0 0.210 262.5 264.0 1.190 322.5 324.0 0.417
204.0 205.5 0.265 264.0 265.5 0.674 324.0 325.5 0.162
205.5 207.0 0.314 265.5 267.0 1.220 325.5 327.0 0.385
207.0 208.5 0.194 267.0 268.5 1.150 327.0 328.5 1.320
208.5 210.0 0.339 268.5 270.0 0.736 328.5 330.0 0.700
210.0 211.5 0.183 270.0 271.5 1.580 330.0 331.5 1.120
211.5 213.0 0.245 271.5 273.0 0.382 331.5 333.0 0.052
213.0 214.5 0.149 273.0 274.5 0.379 333.0 334.5 0.568
214.5 216.0 0.424 274.5 276.0 0.820 334.5 336.0 1.900
216.0 217.5 0.343 276.0 277.5 0.732 336.0 337.5 0.990
217.5 219.0 0.993 277.5 279.0 0.545 337.5 339.0 0.603
219.0 220.5 1.720 279.0 280.5 0.775 339.0 340.5 0.175
220.5 222.0 0.606 280.5 282.0 0.886 340.5 342.0 0.007
222.0 223.5 1.040 282.0 283.5 1.470 342.0 343.5 0.003
223.5 225.0 0.464 283.5 285.0 0.702 343.5 345.0 1.690
225.0 226.5 0.106 285.0 286.5 0.735 345.0 346.5 1.500
226.5 228.0 0.348 286.5 288.0 1.250 346.5 348.0 1.010
228.0 229.5 0.659 288.0 289.5 2.340 348.0 349.5 1.850
229.5 231.0 0.175 289.5 291.0 2.160 349.5 351.0 1.590
231.0 232.5 1.070 291.0 292.5 3.370 351.0 352.5 0.466
232.5 234.0 0.448 292.5 294.0 0.478 352.5 354.0 0.939
234.0 235.5 0.063 294.0 295.5 1.880 354.0 355.5 1.590
235.5 237.0 0.057 295.5 297.0 2.530 355.5 357.0 2.110
237.0 238.5 0.040 297.0 298.5 0.980 357.0 358.5 0.008
238.5 240.0 0.100 298.5 300.0 2.210 358.5 360.0 0.003
240.0 241.5 0.617 300.0 301.5 1.990 360.0 361.5 0.709
241.5 243.0 0.264 301.5 303.0 0.916 361.5 363.0 0.006
243.0 244.5 0.716 303.0 304.5 3.610 363.0 364.5 0.005
244.5 246.0 0.222 304.5 306.0 2.190 364.5 366.0 0.011

 

 

Table 3.0 -TM26-221 (continued)

 

From (m) To (m) Au g/t From (m) To (m) Au g/t From (m) To (m) Au g/t
366.0 367.5 0.006 426.0 427.5 0.003
367.5 369.0 0.003 427.5 429.0 0.054
369.0 370.5 0.005 429.0 430.5 0.003
370.5 372.0 0.006 430.5 432.0 0.003
372.0 373.5 0.006 432.0 433.5 0.003
373.5 375.0 0.005 433.5 435.0 0.003
375.0 376.5 0.003 435.0 436.5 0.003
376.5 378.0 0.003 436.5 438.0 0.025
378.0 379.5 0.061 438.0 439.5 2.450
379.5 381.0 0.013 439.5 441.0 0.727
381.0 382.5 0.003 441.0 442.5 0.585
382.5 384.0 0.003 442.5 444.0 0.217
384.0 385.5 0.005 444.0 445.5 0.340
385.5 387.0 0.003 445.5 447.0 0.691
387.0 388.5 0.003 447.0 448.5 0.574
388.5 390.0 0.003 448.5 450.0 0.696
390.0 391.5 0.003
391.5 393.0 0.003
393.0 394.5 0.003
394.5 396.0 0.030
396.0 397.5 0.033
397.5 399.0 0.113
399.0 400.5 0.003
400.5 402.0 0.026
402.0 403.5 0.321
403.5 405.0 0.498
405.0 406.5 0.495
406.5 408.0 0.616
408.0 409.5 0.123
409.5 411.0 0.018
411.0 412.5 0.066
412.5 414.0 0.105
414.0 415.5 0.003
415.5 417.0 0.006
417.0 418.5 0.455
418.5 420.0 0.007
420.0 421.5 0.028
421.5 423.0 0.155
423.0 424.5 0.324
424.5 426.0 0.167

 

 

To view the core photos for the interval 255.0 metres to 357.0 metres please visit: Thunder Gold Core Images

 

MRE Reconciliation

 

Reconciliation of drill results to date for the Bench Target relative to the 2026 MRE model suggest an overall grade increase relative to model-predicted grades. Figure 3.0 presents a summary of model-predicted grades compared to actual drilled grade for the ten (10) infill holes completed to date. All ten holes post-date the 2026 MRE model and therefore can be compared directly to model-predicted grades to measure the predictive accuracy of the model.

 

The results indicate significant variation on a hole-by-hole basis, ranging from a low of -38% (TM26-214) to a high of 100% (TM26-210). This is typical and within expected tolerances. On a length-weighted average basis, the comparison suggests that actual drilled grade of all ten holes is ~10% higher than the predicted modeled grade.

 

Similar results are observed for the project to date exploration drill holes completed at the UV Target and the holes drilled along the eastern margin of the 2026 MRE optimized pit limit, targeting the large un-estimated portion of the model (Reference Figure 4.0). The exploration data set also suggests that drilled grades are returning higher values than what is currently predicted by the 2026 MRE.

 

Both analyses exclude mineralization intersected outside the 2026 MRE model limit, specifically, the high-grade results intersected in holes TM26-210 and TM23-137X that extend beyond the base of the 2026 MRE model.

 

Figure 3.0 – Modelled Grade Versus Drilled Grade, Infill Drilling, 2026; Weighted by Interval Length

 

 Figure 4.0 – Modelled Grade Versus Drilled Grade, Exploration Drilling, 2026; Weighted by Interval Length

 

MagnetoTellurics Airborne Survey

 

Expert Geophysics Surveys Inc. has been contracted to complete a Mobile MagnetoTellurics airborne survey of the TMIC and the magnetic low halo surrounding the TMIC outward for at least 500 metres based on current airborne magnetic surveys. A total of 285-line kilometres, spaced 100 metres apart, shall be flown in an east-west orientation across the TMIC and the prospective halo mineralization.

 

Numerous case studies, largely from porphyry copper-gold deposits worldwide, suggest Mobile MT can effectively isolate resistivity variation to depths of up to 2.0 kilometres from surface. The Company believes that alteration effectively controls gold mineralization and alteration can be effectively mapped from resistivity response.

 

The proposed 285 line-kilometre Mobile MT is planned to be completed by October 31, 2026, with initial results available by November 15th, in advance of the final drill holes planned for the 2026 field season.

 

Quality Assurance and Quality Control

 

Diamond drilling utilizes NQ diameter tooling. The core is received at the on-site logging facility where it is photographed, logged for geotechnical, physical properties and geological data. Samples are identified, recorded, and cut in half by wet diamond saw. Half the core is sent for assay at an accredited laboratory with the remaining half core stored on site. A standard sample length of 1.5 meters is typically employed, varying only at major lithological contacts.

 

Certified standards and blanks are randomly inserted into the sample stream and constitute approximately 10% of the sample stream. Certified standards and blank performance is monitored with any failures evaluated and investigated to determine if said failure is a result of error during submission. Any unexplained failures are identified and the five samples preceding and following the failure are re-assayed. Commencing in 2026, duplicate pulps are prepared at a rate of 1 in every 20 samples. The duplicate pulps are sent to a second independent analytical facility for analyses.

 

Activation Laboratories Ltd., Thunder Bay, Ontario, ISO/IEC 17025:2017 is the primary independent analytical service provider.

 

AGAT Laboratories, Thunder Bay, Ontario, ISO/IEC 17025:2017 is the secondary, independent analytical facility.

 

Samples are, received, dried, crushed to 80% passing 2.0 mm. A 250-gram sample is split and pulverized. Samples are analyzed for gold using a 30-gram lead collection fire assay fusion (FA) with an atomic absorption (AAS) finish. All assay results greater than 5.0 g/t Au are re-assayed using a gravimetric analysis. All assays greater than 30.0 g/t Au are re-assayed using screen metallics where a representative 1000-gram sample is split sieved at 149µm. Assays are performed on the entire +149 µm fraction and two splits of the -149 µm fraction. A final assay is calculated based on the weight of each size fraction.

 

Qualified Person

 

Technical information in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Wes Hanson, P.Geo., President and CEO of Thunder Gold Corp., who is a Qualified Person under the definitions established by NI 43-101.

 

About the Tower Mountain Gold Property

 

The 7,625-hectare, 100%-owned Tower Mountain Property is beside the Trans-Canada highway, 40-km west of Thunder Bay, Ontario (pop. 120,000). Gold mineralization occurs in variably brecciated and altered rocks surrounding the calc-alkalic Tower Mountain Intrusive Complex. Drilling to date has established an initial mineral resource parallel to the western contact of the intrusion representing approximately 25% of the TMIC halo.

 

The MRE has an effective date of January 19, 2026. A Technical Report titled “NI 43-101 Technical Report for the 2026 Mineral Resource Estimate on the Tower Mountain Project, Ontario, Canada.” is available on the Company’s website at www.thundergoldcorp.com and on SEDAR+ (www.sedarplus.ca) under the Company’s Issuer profile.

 

The Report was prepared by Charley Murahwi, P.Geo., FAusIMM.; William Lewis, P.Geo., Tudorel Ciuculescu, P.Geo., and Richard Gowans, P.Eng., all of Micon International Limited, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. The Report was prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”) and CIM Definition Standards of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves.

 

The MRE is summarized as follows:

 

Tower Mountain Mineral Resource Estimate – January 19, 2026

 

Category Tonnage
(Mt)
Grade
(g/t Au)
Contained Metal
(‘000 oz gold)
Indicated 34.5 0.46 514
Inferred 211.1 0.45 3,053

 

Notes:

  1. The effective date of this MRE is January 19, 2026.
  2. Messrs. William Lewis, P.Geo., Charley Murahwi, P.Geo., FAusIMM, and Tudorel Ciuculescu, P.Geo. from Micon International Limited are the Qualified Persons (QPs) responsible for this MRE.
  3. The MRE has been classified in the Indicated and Inferred categories. At this time, there are no Measured resources at the Tower Mountain Project.
  4. The calculated gold cut-off grade is 0.19 g/t Au.
  5. An average specific gravity (SG) value of 2.77 g/cm3 was used.
  6. The MRE used economic assumptions for open pit mining. The following economic parameters were used for generating the cut-off grade: a gold price of US$3,000/oz, 80% recovery, open pit mining cost of US$3.0/t, processing costs of US$8.0/t, general and administration cost of US$3.5/t, transportation cost of US$2.5/oz of gold, and a royalty of 3%.
  7. The open pit used slope angles of 30° in overburden and 50° in fresh rock.
  8. The block model is orthogonal and has a parent block size of 5 m x 5 m x 5 m, with minimum sub-block size of 2.5 m x 2.5 m x 2.5 m.
  9. The open pit optimization used a re-blocked size of 10 m x 10 m x 10 m.
  10. The mineral resources described above have been prepared in accordance with the current Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum Standards and Practices.
  11. Numbers have been rounded to the nearest million tonnes and nearest thousand ounces. Differences may occur in totals due to rounding.
  12. Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves as they do not have demonstrated economic viability. The quantity and grade of reported Inferred Mineral Resources are uncertain in nature and there has been insufficient exploration; however, it is reasonably expected that a significant portion of Inferred Mineral Resources could be upgraded into Indicated Mineral Resources with further exploration.
  13. Micon QPs have not identified any legal, political, environmental, or other relevant factors that could materially affect the potential development of the mineral resources and of the estimate.

 

The remaining 75% of the TMIC halo demonstrates similar geology, alteration, and geophysical signatures and is untested by drilling.

 

A second gold trend, identified in 2026, outcrops at surface and is continuously mineralized over a 100-metre width. This gold mineralization occurs within Timiskaming-type conglomerates that have been traced for over 5.0 kilometres along a southwest trend paralleling the Thunder Lake Fault. The Company believes both targets offer opportunities to materially increase the total resource through systematic drilling.

 

About Thunder Gold Corp.

 

Thunder Gold is advancing the Tower Mountain project in Thunder Bay, Ont. — an emerging gold system with the scale, consistency and quality to support a long-life, open-pit operation. Results from the disciplined drill programs have consistently reinforced confidence in the continuity and predictability of the discovery while highlighting significant potential for expansion across multiple zones of the Tower Mountain intrusive complex. With industry-leading drilling costs, existing infrastructure and a skilled local work force, Tower Mountain represents a rare combination of size, scalability and cost-effective growth.

 

At Thunder Gold, our vision is clear: to unlock a discovery that has the potential to become a transformational gold project, delivering long-term value for shareholders while contributing to the future of Canada’s mining industry.

 

Posted October 19, 2026

Share this news article

MORE or "UNCATEGORIZED"


Sage Potash Corp.'s Updated Mineral Resource Estimate Delivers 226 Million Tonnes at 41.36% KCl in Measured & Indicated and an Additional 545.4 Million Tonnes at 41.53% KCl in Inferred

Sage Potash Corp. (TSX-V: SAGE) (OTCQB: SGPTF) is pleased to anno... READ MORE

October 19, 2026

Nexus Uranium Announces Closing of $1.92 Million Financing

Nexus Uranium Corp. (CSE: NEXU) (OTCQB: NEXUF) (FSE: JA7) is plea... READ MORE

October 19, 2026

Renforth Successfully Intersects Gold in Both Drillholes Undercutting Surface Gold Results within the 2025 MRE Pit Shell at Wholly Owned Parbec Gold Deposit in Malartic, Quebec

68 g/t Au over 0.85m from 262.85m to 263.7m in PAR-26-149 is the ... READ MORE

October 19, 2026

Evolve Royalties to Acquire a Portfolio of Seven Royalties, Including Copper Royalties on Portions of Osisko Metals’ Gaspé Copper Project and Red Brook Property Recently Optioned by Osisko Metals

Evolve Royalties Ltd. (CSE: EVR; OTCQX: EVRYF) is pleased to anno... READ MORE

October 19, 2026

Tiger Gold Extends Mineralization to the South at Ceibal, Drilling 268 m @ 0.5 g/t Au from Surface

Tiger Gold Corp. (TSX-V: TIGR) (FSE: D150) (OTCQB: TGRGF) is plea... READ MORE

October 19, 2026

Copyright 2026 The Prospector News